Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

FILE PHOTO: Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro checks his Blackberry as he waits to cross the street in Ottawa, Wednesday June 6, 2012.

Adrian Wyld/The Canadian Press

Parliament should look into how to raise the level of online discourse by making anonymous commenters identify themselves, according to Conservative MP Dean Del Mastro.

"While I believe firmly that the right to free speech must be strongly defended and protected, I also believe it should be backed up by the common decency to stand by one's words as opposed to hiding behind online anonymity," the Peterborough MP said in the House of Commons Friday.

"Anonymous online attacks are, in my view, cowardly but they are no less hurtful and represent a caustic scourge that is harming too many in our society."

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Del Mastro, Parliamentary Secretary to the Prime Minister, first brought up the issue on his Facebook page Thursday. Mr. Del Mastro has rarely spoken publicly in recent months, as Elections Canada probes allegations of campaign spending irregularities by his 2008 campaign.

The debate over online speech has taken on another dimension with tragic cases of online bullying, such as that of Amanda Todd. All parties have agreed that bullying is an issue, and both the Liberals and NDP have proposed legislation to address it.

Many websites, including, yes, The Globe and Mail, have struggled with what to do about online commenting. Most news websites either allow anonymous comments or verification through other social media accounts.

But any legislative approach to limiting online speech would be "enormously problematic," said Michael Geist, a law professor specializing in the Internet and online commerce at the University of Ottawa.

"Del Mastro is right that people often say things online with the veil of anonymity that they would never say if identified or commenting in person," Mr. Geist said. "We need to work on better online etiquette, but banning anonymous speech isn't the way to do it."

He said any federal regulation would likely be open to a constitutional challenge and could have a chilling effect on cases where anonymous communication is particularly important, such as whistleblowers, those suffering from health problems or those in an abusive relationship.

The commenters on Mr. Del Mastro's Facebook page, for their part, expressed both sides of the debate – presumably using their real names.

Story continues below advertisement

"The fact that people can register on comment boards and on-line without having to identify themselves not only protects their identity, but also degrades the quality of news and transfer of information. Me and my family have fallen victim to these people running on aliases, and it would only improve things if people were obliged to use their real identity!" wrote Paul Teleki.

"Completely unenforceable, and some people have very good reasons for requiring anonymity online (whistleblowers, political dissidents, and so on and so forth.) I agree that lots of what we see online is terrible, but this idea is nonsense," wrote Robert Hailman.

Commenters, we throw it to you. You can tell us below (probably anonymously) or on Facebook (probably with your real name) what you think.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies