Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

What are the political implications of prorogation?

Stephen Harper's decision to shut down Parliament until after the Vancouver Olympics has sped up Ottawa's winter thaw and sent thousands of Canadians into the streets - including a handful of expatriates marching on Trafalgar Square.

The forced pause in debate has allowed the Prime Minister to tweak his cabinet team and lay the groundwork for an era of belt-tightening that begins when the budget is tabled in March.

With the House of Commons quiet, opposition parties were expected to return to Ottawa this week as scheduled with guns blazing. Disaster in Haiti has put the government's day of reckoning on hold, but the gamesmanship continues with the Conservatives making every effort to appear busy slaying the deficit while the Liberals make lofty vows of job creation..

Story continues below advertisement

So, with both Michael Ignatieff and Jack Layton attempting to put legislative restraints on any future use of prorogation, we're pleased to welcome Jane Taber and Norman Spector for a live discussion on what it all means for Mr. Harper, his opponents and Canadian democracy in general.

Ms. Taber, The Globe's senior political writer, and Mr. Spector, a Globe blogger and career public servant with expertise on the historical and constitutional issues involved in prorogation, were online Thursday to take your questions. Review a transcript of the the discussion in the window below.

<iframe src="" scrolling="no" height="650px" width="600px" frameBorder ="0" allowTransparency="true" ><a href="" >Question Period: Jane Taber and Norman Spector on prorogation</a></iframe>

Report an error
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this resolved by the end of January 2018. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to