Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Smoke pours from the stacks at the Portlands Energy Centre in Toronto, January 15, 2009. An environmental analyst says a new report revealing that oil and gas production has become the single biggest source of greenhouse gas emissions adds further weight to calls for Ottawa to regulate the sector.

Frank Gunn/The Canadian Press

The federal government will spend as much as $2-million to review the "relevance and performance" of the key pillar of its greenhouse gas reduction strategy – one critics say is piecemeal and has failed to put Canada on track to meet its emissions reduction targets.

Environment Canada on Tuesday issued a request for proposals for an "evaluation" of Canada's Clean Air Regulatory Agenda (CARA). Created in 2006, the first year of Stephen Harper's tenure as Prime Minister, CARA supports and finances emissions-reduction initiatives in several departments, plus research and emissions reporting, and other projects.

CARA's two key regulatory achievements have been tougher emissions standards for vehicles and coal power plants. Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq frequently mentions both. In these areas, however, Ottawa is largely following the lead of other jurisdictions – provinces and the United States – and CARA has yet to tackle the booming oil-and-gas sector, in which the government expects emissions to surge by 23 per cent between 2011 and 2020.

Story continues below advertisement

With a decision on the controversial Northern Gateway pipeline due by mid-June, Ottawa has rolled out several green-tinged announcements in recent weeks, such as renewed land conservation efforts and tougher pipeline safety standards. But oil-and-gas emissions regulations have been delayed, and the third-party CARA review will not cover this area.

"It will actually be a review of what is in place, and what is in place is very, very little," NDP environment critic Megan Leslie said, later adding: "It's incredible to me we will have this review system for such a paltry regulatory regime on greenhouse gases."

Liberal critic John McKay said the Harper government's track record on emissions reduction has been a "miserable failure," and has left Canada with little environmental credibility in its push for the Keystone XL pipeline project to carry crude to the U.S. gulf coast.

"You have nothing to say to President [Barack] Obama because you've not been serious about negotiating GHG emissions [limits]," Mr. McKay said, adding the delay is "appalling from an environmental standpoint, and it's appalling from a political standpoint and it's appalling from an economic standpoint."

The government posted a request for proposals from audit and consulting firms on Tuesday for the CARA review, which it estimates will cost as much as $2-million. Environment Canada spokesman Mark Johnson said a review is required every five years, and the previous one was completed in 2010.

CARA was renewed in 2011 at an estimated cost of $252-million over the first two years, part of the government's five-year, $1.5-billion Clean Air Agenda. The Conservative government has pledged to reduce total annual GHG emissions to about 612 megatonnes by 2020, but is on track to come in well over that – 734 megatonnes – due largely to growing oil-and-gas emissions, which will make up 28 per cent of Canada's total by 2020.

Ms. Leslie said the Conservative government is focusing on "minor achievements" and ignoring the bigger picture.

Story continues below advertisement

"It's going to be a review of two regulations – [vehicle and coal power emissions]. It's not a review of, 'Are we meeting our goal'? We're not. 'Will we meet it?' We won't," she said. "Maybe we don't need a review of those things because they're so patently obvious, but it's not actually an assessment of how we're doing overall."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies