Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); }

Quebec Premier Pauline Marois responds to Opposition questions on the placement of construction labour Tuesday, December 4, 2012 at the legislature in Quebec City.

Jacques Boissinot/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Canadian flag will remain on display in the legislative chambers known as the Red Room of the Quebec National Assembly, much to the displeasure of the Parti Québécois government.

A motion by the PQ to have the Maple Leaf permanently removed during National Assembly committee hearings was soundly defeated.

The Liberals and the Coalition Avenir Quebec banded together and voted 65 to 53 against the PQ minority government's efforts to remove the Maple Leaf.

Story continues below advertisement

The Liberals and the CAQ refused the PQ's demand to debate the issue. When the motion was recently presented by the PQ member of the National Assembly Yves-François Blanchet, the opposition parties argued that the flag issue was not a priority for Quebeckers.

Nonetheless, the issue created some discomfort within the CAQ which includes a certain number of pro-sovereignty members within its ranks.

"We are a coalition of sovereignists and federalists with federalists who strongly believe in Canada. And this is certainly not a priority. Everyone agrees that with the issues of corruption, poor management of public funds and economic problems that this is not the time be concerned about the flag," Mr. Legault said.

Mr. Blanchet, who was sworn-in on Tuesday as the new Environment Minister was disappointed that he could not replace the Maple Leaf with the Quebec flag. But he seemed satisfied that although his motion was defeated it served to show the true political allegiance of the CAQ.

"Why are the Liberals and even more so the Coalition ashamed to explain their positions? I hope the voters in their ridings watched them stand-up and vote a position that is ultra-federalist. The Quebec flag is not a sovereignist symbol. It is the symbol of all Quebeckers." Mr. Blanchet said.

The PQ argued that as a nation the only flag that should be displayed in the two chambers of the National Assembly should be the Quebec flag, the Fleur-de-lis. During partisan events or official ceremonies such as the swearing-in of ministers that are held in the sumptuous Red Room, the PQ has always had the Canadian flag removed.

The Canadian flag has never been a permanent fixture in the so-called Bleu Room that houses the assembly for debates such Question period. The Maple Leaf was introduced by the Liberals in the Red Room in the 1980's then removed by the PQ in the 1990's and refitted again next to the Quebec Flag when the Liberals returned to power in 2003.

Story continues below advertisement

Without a majority government and despite the support of the two members of Quebec Solidaire, the PQ had no choice but to bow to the will of those who continue to argue the need for a Canadian symbol in the National Assembly.

"We now have this setback, imposed on the Quebec National Assembly which restricts it from displaying its own flag," Mr. Blanchet said, calling it a "dark" and "shameful" gesture. "I believe we can show that we have more pride than that."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies