Skip to main content

A woman holds a sign during a protest against the Quebec Charter of Values in Montreal, September 14, 2013. Thousands took to the streets to denounce the province's proposed bill to ban the wearing of any overt religious garb by government paid employees.

CHRISTINNE MUSCHI/REUTERS

The Parti Québécois government's proposal of a Charter of Values that bans public servants from wearing religious garments has deeply divided Quebeckers but has been better received by francophones and has made the PQ more popular, a new poll shows.

According to the Léger Marketing survey, the charter idea has boosted support for the PQ by six points, to 33 per cent, since elements began leaking in August. In the last poll before the charter was in the public debate in June, PQ support was at 27 per cent.

However, the provincial Liberals remained the choice of 36 per cent of decided voters, meaning that an election now would be a toss-up between the two leading parties and could end with another minority government.

Story continues below advertisement

The online survey was conducted between Sept. 13 and 14, after the proposal was unveiled, triggering an emotional debate.

The poll shows that 43 per cent of respondents supported the charter while 42 per cent were against.

However, in the key francophone electorate, the plan had the backing of 49 per cent of respondents while 34 per cent were opposed.

Among anglophones, only 15 per cent favoured the charter while 72 per cent were against.

Support for the proposal appeared to have diminished.

In August, when parts of the plan were first leaked, about 57 per cent of respondents in a previous Léger poll said the charter was a good idea.

The charter has been seen by many observers as a wedge-politic tactic targeting francophone voters in swing ridings in Quebec's outlying regions.

Story continues below advertisement

In at least one key electoral battleground, the suburbs around Montreal, the proposal was well received. On the Montreal south shore, the charter garnered 45-per-cent support while in areas north of Montreal, 48 per cent of respondents were favourable.

The charter was also welcome in western Quebec (from the Outaouais to the Abitibi-Témiscamingue region), where 46 per cent of respondents said they were in favour.

The two largest cities in the province however didn't welcome the proposal.

On the island of Montreal, the most multi-ethnic part of Quebec, 40 per cent were for the charter and 49 per cent against. In Quebec City, support was even lower, at 37 per cent, while 48 per cent said they were against.

One criticism of the PQ proposal is that its attempt to remove conspicuous religious signs from the public space stops short of banning some traditional Roman Catholic artifacts such as the crucifix hanging in the Quebec National Assembly. The poll shows that Quebeckers still remain attached to such Christian symbols, which the PQ said should be exempted because they have a "heritage" value. Asked about the crucifix in their legislature, 54 per cent of respondents said they agreed it should remain, and only 38 per cent disagreed.

To conduct the poll, Léger Marketing queried 2,000 Quebeckers who were previously recruited to be part of its Internet polling panel. Statistical margins of error are not applicable to online polls but Léger said a probabilistic sample of similar size would yield a margin of error of plus or minus 2.2 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter