Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Support quality journalism
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24weeks
The Globe and Mail
Support quality journalism
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Globe and Mail website displayed on various devices
Just$1.99
per week
for the first 24weeks

var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){console.log("scroll");var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1);

Justin Trudeau handled Canada's internal climate-change talks with premiers like those international summits on the same issue: He took the half-loaf of vague principles that he could get and claimed progress, noting that there is an agreement to keep trying for more.

The difference is that the Prime Minister has more power to use this deal to get what he wants next time than any host of United Nations talks ever did.

No, Mr. Trudeau didn't get premiers to sign on to a specific national carbon price. There wasn't much hope of that. He was also never going to impose one now, despite public musings by Environment Minister Catherine McKenna and the fears of some provinces. That was a warning that he has a hammer he can use in the future.

Story continues below advertisement

So the outcome of the first ministers meeting in Vancouver sounded eerily like what we've seen come out of COP (conference of the parties) gatherings, such as the latest one in Paris in December: Participants can't agree on tricky nitty-gritty details of reducing emissions, so they settle on broad targets and principles.

The premiers agreed that world temperatures can't rise more than two degrees Celsius, that Canada's emissions must be cut 30 per cent, that they must set targets to reduce emissions, and that that requires carbon pricing. Mr. Trudeau's principal secretary, Gerald Butts, tweeted that was "#progress."

But it's words. The commitments are vague. Crucially, provinces can interpret what constitutes carbon pricing. That's not just the difference between B.C.'s carbon tax and the cap-and-trade system Quebec joined, but other things as well. Saskatchewan Premier Brad Wall argues that his province's carbon capture-and-storage projects count as pricing too, although it hasn't turned out to be a cost-effective way to reduce emissions.

So the glass-half-empty conclusion is that it's a squidgy, politicians' agreement, without enforceable substance. The glass-half-full version is that all the premiers signed on to something Mr. Trudeau can use to push again – and he has levers.

For starters, the declaration is a reminder that everyone has agreed to goals and carbon pricing, including premiers who are less excited about reducing emissions, such as Mr. Wall.

When Mr. Trudeau wanted that wording, he had allies from the biggest provinces, including Ontario, Quebec and now Alberta. B.C.'s Christy Clark touts her province's $30-a-tonne tax. Premiers concerned about carbon pricing, such as Mr. Wall and Nova Scotia's Stephen McNeil, knew that if they balked at Mr. Trudeau's bottom line, they would be relatively isolated. They took half a loaf too.

And look at the fine print. They didn't define carbon pricing – but they set up a working group to "consider the effectiveness of various carbon-pricing mechanisms to contribute to the certainty of emission reductions and their efficiency at achieving this objective at the lowest possible cost."

Story continues below advertisement

No one thinks that Mr. Wall's capture-and-storage plans will be low-cost any time soon.

Of course, the premiers still don't have to agree on a carbon price that meets those criteria. But the declaration also calls for the feds to help fund ways to reach further emissions reductions.

The provinces that want a share of the money might find that Ottawa insists they work along the lines of the declaration.

Unlike the UN climate conference in Paris, where the host, French President François Hollande, could only cajole big players with vastly different goals, Mr. Trudeau is the biggest player, and he has allies among the biggest provinces who are all pledging climate action.

And for those who don't join, there's the threat that Ottawa will impose a carbon price. The threat isn't to impose a nationwide carbon tax – it's a federal carbon pricing in provinces that don't have their own.

Mr. Trudeau's Liberals only floated it this time. But they still insist that there will be a national, minimum carbon price. The question is when. Is there a deadline when each province must have its own carbon price or Ottawa will impose one? Is it when the first ministers meet again in October, or in 2017, when their framework is supposed to go into effect?

Story continues below advertisement

For now, Mr. Trudeau has accepted a diplomat's outcome, like those at international talks. But he still has levers the UN can't muster.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies