Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

PC Alberta leadership candidate Jim Prentice speaks during the leadership forum in Edmonton, Alta., in August. The leadership race has has its first-ballot vote set for Saturday.

JASON FRANSON/The Canadian Press

The long-simmering fight for access to former federal minister Jim Prentice's expense records has led to calls for an independent investigation after a list identifying the people seeking records was circulated in his former department.

The list's existence was revealed Thursday by La Presse, prompting calls by those on it for an investigation into why they were identified within the department on a politically sensitive file. However, Aboriginal Affairs says it will investigate the leak, rather than the existence of the list itself, putting the matter in the hands of Canada's Information Commissioner and Privacy Commissioner.

One of the requesters on the list, Derek Fildebrandt of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, is also questioning whether there was "potential political interference" in a case that saw the federal government first deny the Prentice records existed, then later recover them when pressed.

Story continues below advertisement

The man in charge of the department's access to information and privacy program, Kent Glowinski, is said to have ties to the former federal Progressive Conservative party, of which Mr. Prentice once sought the leadership. The CTF says he should have recused himself from the process. He did not respond to requests for comment.

The saga began earlier this year, when Mr. Prentice announced his candidacy for the Alberta PC leadership – a race that has its first-ballot vote set for Saturday. That led to access-to-information requests being filed for his time as Aboriginal Affairs minister. A list was created within the department that identified half a dozen people who made those requests, including the CTF and researchers for three opposition parties, according to La Presse, which obtained a copy of the list.

The CTF was told in June by James Larkin, an Aboriginal Affairs official, that Mr. Prentice's expense records had been "destroyed." The CTF says it asked for a review, which confirmed the records were destroyed. The CTF, in turn, filed requests for similar records around the same time frame. After those were filed, Mr. Glowinski wrote the CTF on Aug. 20 to say the records had been found.

Treasury Board guidelines say a requester's identity should only be revealed when there is a "clear need to know in order to perform duties and functions related to a lawful program or activity." It's not clear how widely the list was circulated.

It was created "for internal administration of Access to Information and Privacy," the department said in a written statement.

A spokesperson for the Information Commissioner said Thursday no complaint had been received. The CTF's Mr. Fildebrandt says he will ask the Information Commissioner to investigate the violation of privacy, who produced the list, with whom it was shared and whether there was "any potential political interference," saying Mr. Glowinski's background raises questions in this case. "At the very least, the optics are such that he should have recused himself" from handling the Prentice requests, Mr. Fildebrandt said.

Several messages left for Mr. Glowinski on Thursday were not returned, including detailed questions about his political history. Sources said it's the same Kent Glowinski who ran unsuccessfully for the federal PCs in 1997 before taking a job at the party headquarters. Mr. Prentice sought the federal PC leadership in 2003.

Story continues below advertisement

However, another PC party staffer at the time – Susan Elliott, who also worked on Mr. Prentice's leadership campaign – said Thursday she didn't believe Mr. Glowinski had any close ties to the minister. "To the best of my knowledge, he doesn't have any particular relationship to Prentice. … The other thing I would say is I would argue he's a consummate professional," Ms. Elliott said.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies