Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Alberta's Premier Alison Redford takes part in a news conference on Parliament Hill in Ottawa November 17, 2011.

BLAIR GABLE

Rookie Alberta Premier Alison Redford is asking that her oil-rich province get its fair share of health-care transfers – something it was denied in the last national accord on the matter.

Speaking to reporters Thursday after meeting with Prime Minister Stephen Harper, Ms. Redford couldn't, however, identify fellow premiers who might back her call for Alberta to be awarded its full per capita share of health cash.

Ms. Redford, who took office only last month, should be able to count on several premiers for support as Alberta tries to grab a bigger piece of the transfer pot, including Ontario's Dalton McGuinty and Saskatchewan's Brad Wall.

Story continues below advertisement

Economists have estimated that Alberta would receive as much as $850-million to $1-billion more in annual health transfer funding if it received a full proportionate share.

Ms. Redford said she realizes not every premier will back her campaign, but she hinted at the fact that Albertans pay more in taxes to Ottawa than they get back in funding or programs.

"I think it's probably quite predictable that some won't be" supportive, she said of other premiers. "That's part of a wider conversation. We have a federation where everyone makes contributions to the federation and expects citizens to be treated equally."

Ottawa's 10-year health funding accord with the provinces is due to expire on April 1, 2014, and premiers are already girding themselves for a battle to preserve the gains of the last deal.

It will be hard for all premiers to agree on the way forward, but they are meeting in Victoria in January to discuss what they want in the next health transfer deal. Premiers are worried that even if Mr. Harper gives them what they want on health, he may claw support back in other areas.

Separately, Ms. Redford took the unusual step of calling on Canadian politicians to stop lobbying their U.S. counterparts regarding the controversial Keystone XL oil sands pipeline that would ship Alberta petroleum to the United States.

"It is not appropriate for us to be providing advice to American decision-makers in that context and be political activists," she said at a news conference in Ottawa. "I am not at all supportive of that and I'm disappointed about it."

Story continues below advertisement

Her plea, made Thursday, just days after her visit to Washington, is addressed to proponents of the pipeline as well as those who have gone to the U.S. capital in an effort to kill the project.

The Harper government has criticized federal NDP MPs who recently lobbied U.S. lawmakers to block TransCanada Corp.'s proposed $7-billion project.

When Ms. Redford was asked about the NDP's trip to Washington, her criticism stretched to those working to convince the United States to approve the project.

Ms. Redford's call for Canadian politicians to stop lobbying Americans would appear to be a warning to the Harper government too, but her spokesman later backed off that notion – saying she was not talking about cabinet ministers.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the authors of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies