Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Royal ruckus: Is military name-change worthwhile?

Navy, army and air-force officers hold flags of the three forces at a Halifax ceremony announcing the government's decision to restore their traditional names on Aug. 16, 2011.

Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press

The Harper government's decision to reinstate the traditional names of the Royal Canadian Navy, the Royal Canadian Air Force and the Canadian Army is far from unanimous.

To Defence Minister Peter MacKay, it's a matter of restoring military pride. But historian Jack Granatstein calls it "abject colonialism" while The Globe and Mail's editorial board supports the change as a "confident move" Canadians should embrace.

Is this a nod to our rich military history or a return to our colonial roots? Mr. Granatstein and Globe editorial board editor John Geiger debated the issue and took reader questions Wednesday.

Story continues below advertisement

Review the discussion using the panel below. Mobile users can click here for a smartphone-friendly interface.

<iframe src="" scrolling="no" height="650px" width="460px" frameBorder="0" allowTransparency="true" ><a href="" >Jack Granatstein and John Geiger on Canada's military monikers</a></iframe>

Report an error Editorial code of conduct Licensing Options
As of December 20, 2017, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this resolved by the end of January 2018. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to