Skip to main content

Fired Senate page Brigette DePape takes a call between media interviews in Ottawa after she disrupted the Speech from the Throne with a 'Stop Harper' placard on June 3, 2011.

Mike Blanchfield/THE CANADIAN PRESS

It shows how asinine Heather Mallick's column was in today's Star that Jonathan Kay has written a perfectly cogent rebuttal for the National Post and yet didn't even graze what I thought was the worst part.

No, the paragraph I'm referring to is a special combination of idiotic, troubling and incomprehensible:

"[Canada]is a country, DePape said, that needs 'an Arab Spring.' I have never heard the Harper-managed Canadian slide into backwater status put more eloquently. Well played, Brigette. She's bright, she's brave, she made her stand. If that makes her elitist – Harper's favourite pejorative – so be it."

Story continues below advertisement

The term Arab Spring evokes lots of words and images: overthrowing corrupt dictatorships through violent and non-violent means, fighting for basic rights, setting one's self on fire – pretty serious uprising the face of historic rights violations.

What in the world does Mallick mean that Canada needs an Arab Spring? What could it possibly mean? We just had a free and fair election. It wasn't the result I was hoping for but democracy sucks that way. Is she saying that we need to overthrow the just-elected democratic government of Canada? No, that's crazy. Ok, let me take it in the opposite direction: Is she calling for more petty acts of civil disobedience like the page's sign display and rush to the nearest TV camera? If so then she's trivializing the Arab Spring protests to the point of absurdity.

As for the page being "brave" and "making her stand," she was brave the same way a drunken baseball fan who runs on the field for $20 from his buddy – knowing he is certain to get kicked out of the stadium and charged – is "brave." The key difference is TV networks avert the cameras when a fan runs on the field. I'm not sure why the page even got her full 15 minutes.

But back to Mallick and her ode to he need for a Canadian Arab Spring. Imagine a radio host from the Arab world interviewing Mallick about this column:

Radio host: "We have on the line from Toronto, Canada journalist Heather Mallick of the Toronto Star who wrote this weekend that Canada needs it's own Arab spring. Heather, thanks for joining us"

Heather Mallick: "Great to be here"

Host: "Canada just had free and fair elections of the kind no Arab country has ever held. You have freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of mobility – I could go on. Why do you think Canada needs it's own 'Arab spring'?"

Story continues below advertisement

Mallick: "Well, that's all true but our Prime Minister, he's a real piece of work"

Host: "Oh, my researcher must have missed that. I'm sorry, I don't know much about your tyrannical Prime Minister that you seek to liberate your people from. So he's killed thousands of innocent citizens, arrested his political opponents?"

Mallick: "Well no, but he ran really nasty TV ads about his opponents. More importantly, he's turned Canada into a backwater, and that's why we need our own Arab Spring"

Host: [30 seconds of awkward silence followed by what sounds like cursing in Arabic by the radio host to his producer for booking this guest.] "Thanks for joining us Heather Mallick, from the Toronto Star who thinks Canada needs its own revolution to overthrow the government they just elected. Over to you, Abdul, for traffic."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies