Skip to main content

Quebec Premier Pauline Marois makes an announcement on PQ food sovereignty, Thursday May 16, 2013 at Baie St-Paul.

Clement Allard/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The opposition party that holds the balance of power in the Quebec National Assembly supports a ban on religious headgear for teachers and other authority figures, but says the Parti Québécois's reported Charter of Quebec Values goes too far.

François Legault, leader of the Coalition Avenir Québec (CAQ), says he views the minority Marois government's charter, details of which were leaked to the media, as "too radical." According to reports, the government would ban religious symbols such as Sikh turbans, Muslim hijabs and Jewish kippas in the public service and in workplaces such as daycares, schools and hospitals.

Mr. Legault, the second opposition party after the Liberals, says Quebec needs a charter of secularism and Quebeckers are seeking guidelines to protect their values and heritage. His party would prevent judges, police officers and prison guards from sporting religious symbols, as well as elementary and high-school school teachers.

Story continues below advertisement

"We think a teacher who's with a child is in a position of authority," Mr. Legault said.

However, his party believes the ban should not extend to doctors or daycare workers, he added. And preventing a government office worker from wearing a cross around her neck goes too far, an example he offered repeatedly when he laid out his party's position at a press conference.

Mr. Legault also said the crucifix in Quebec's National Assembly should remain in place, as it reflects the Catholic heritage of a majority of Quebeckers.

Mr. Legault, whose party has 19 seats, made the comments amid evidence the PQ government's proposed charter is opening deep fracture lines in the province, with a majority of francophones supporting the idea and most non-francophones against it.

A new public-opinion poll suggests Ms. Marois's message over the weekend – that the Charter will unify the province – holds some truth among Quebec's francophone majority only.

The Léger poll, published Monday in the Journal de Montréal, suggests that 65 per cent of francophone Quebeckers consider the idea of a Charter of Quebec Values a good idea.

Linguistic minorities are considerably less favourable to the idea; according to the findings, the Charter is opposed by a majority of anglophones and allophones (those whose mother tongue is neither English nor French). Only 25 per cent of anglophones and 33 per cent of allophones believe it is a good idea, the survey suggests.

Story continues below advertisement

The findings suggest that the Parti Québécois of Ms. Marois has found a fertile issue to drum up support in its electoral base.

The issue of accommodating religious minorities appears to resonate more strongly outside Montreal, where immigration is low and provincial election races are won and lost.

Three in four Quebeckers outside Montreal believe that Quebec makes too many accommodations for religious minorities. However, even in multicultural Montreal, where the overwhelming number of immigrants settle, 61 per cent are of the same opinion, according to Léger.

Nonetheless, nearly one Quebecker in two believe the controversial Charter will stir up conflict and only 28 per cent believe it will resolve the issue of religious accommodations, the poll finds.

The Internet survey polled 1,000 people on Friday and Saturday, and is considered accurate plus or minus 3.1 per cent, 19 times out of 20.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter