Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Supreme Court ruling on photocopy fees could spell big savings for schools

Grade 2 French teacher Natalie Ruel helps students in her class with math work at Mother Teresa elementary school in Calgary, Alberta on June 21, 2012.

TODD KOROL/The Globe and Mail

Educators should be allowed to photocopy short texts and excerpts for their students without paying a copyright fee, the Supreme Court of Canada has ruled.

The ruling requires the Copyright Board of Canada to reconsider a narrow definition they've developed for the kinds of educational materials that are considered "fair dealing," and therefore exempt from copyright tariffs.

According to the board, only photocopies made by students qualify, but the Supreme Court decision suggests that some photocopies teachers make for students should also qualify.

Story continues below advertisement

School boards and education ministries pay millions of dollars in annual tariffs in order to distribute photocopies to students. Nova Scotia's Education Minister Ramona Jennex said schools stand to recover as much as $6-million in copyright tariffs based on the decision.

"We're extremely pleased," she said. "It's fantastic news for education."

She noted that teachers in other countries, including the U.S., Germany and Japan, can make photocopies for their students without the school system paying fees.

Teachers often use photocopies of short excerpts from sources such as newspapers, magazines and books to supplement class resources. Under the Copyright Board's definition of fair dealing, school systems must pay for the copies because they're used for instruction rather than private study.

By that definition, if a teacher were to line their students up at the photocopier and have them make the copies themselves, they could avoid the tariffs.

The decision doesn't eliminate the tariffs that school boards and education ministries pay, though it will likely reduce them. The Copyright Board is expected to review the tariffs in light of the Supreme Court's decision.

"We're disappointed about the outcome of the decision," said Roanie Levy, general counsel for Access Copyright.

Story continues below advertisement

She cautioned that the decision only applies to about 6 per cent of copying in education. "It's important to keep it in perspective," she said.

Her group calculated that copyright owners would stand to lose $1.3-million a year on school materials.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Authors
Education reporter

Kate Hammer started her journalism career in New York, chasing crime and breaking news for The New York Times. She came to the Globe and Mail in 2008 to do much of the same and ended up investigating allegations of animal cruelty and mismanagement at the Toronto Humane Society. More

Josh O’Kane is a reporter with The Globe and Mail's Report on Business. Since joining the paper in 2011, he has told stories from New Brunswick to Nairobi. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨