Skip to main content

Candidate Harinder Takhar walked over to Sandra Pupatello’s camp after being eliminated on the first ballot at the Ontario Liberal leadership convention in Toronto on Jan. 26, 2013.

Peter Power/The Globe and Mail

Harinder Takhar threw Sandra Pupatello a lifeline when she really, really needed one.

Ms. Pupatello, who came into this weekend's Ontario Liberal leadership convention as the front-runner to become Dalton McGuinty's replacement, did not get off to a very good start on its pivotal day – or at least, not really as good as her main rival.

Kathleen Wynne significantly outperformed Ms. Pupatello during Saturday morning's candidates' speeches, confidently addressing concerns about her forcefulness as a public speaker, and directly challenging the idea that the province might not be ready for an openly gay premier. Shortly thereafter, it was announced that she trailed Ms. Pupatello by just two out of 2,084 votes on the convention's first ballot, with both candidates' support rounding to 29 per cent. And then sixth-place candidate Eric Hoskins responded to being knocked off the next ballot by making a dramatic march over to Ms. Wynne.

Story continues below advertisement

For a few minutes, it appeared Ms. Wynne had all the momentum. But then, when nobody was paying much attention, Mr. Takhar crossed over to Ms. Pupatello.

His decision, or at least the timing of it, was slightly peculiar. Mr. Takhar is known to have been sensitive to perceptions that he entered the race as a stalking horse for Ms. Pupatello, and to media insinuations that he was not a serious candidate; then he jumped out of the race to support her before he needed to do so, and after he had already missed his window to take his name off the second ballot.

Mr. Takhar's officials insist the decision was made entirely within their camp, and did not involve discussions with Ms. Pupatello. But there will be widespread suspicions about what might have been offered to him in order to change his mind so quickly, and just when Ms. Pupatello needed him to do so.

His support is likely to widen Ms. Pupatello's lead somewhat, since he won 11 per cent of votes on the first ballot next to Mr. Hoskins' 7 per cent. But the race remains very much either frontrunner's for the taking.

Charles Sousa, who finished narrowly behind Mr. Takhar in fifth, is said to be struggling with his decision, while third-place candidate Gerard Kennedy seems an easier fit with Ms. Wynne.

The final result could well depend, then, on whether defeated candidates are able to get most of their supporters to follow them, which is no sure thing at any delegated convention.

While his late decision could cause some confusion on the second ballot, it appears Mr. Takhar should be able to deliver extremely effectively to Ms. Pupatello. Conversely, sources say that Mr. Sousa's supporters are heavily divided on which candidate to go to, so he could have trouble carrying an overwhelming number of them to either.

Story continues below advertisement

For now, Mr. Sousa is being heavily courted by both camps, who are eager for what they hope will finally be a definitive momentum sway.

Follow related topics

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies