Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

NDP Leader Jack Layton and his wife, Toronto MP Olivia Chow, walk to Parliament Hill on May 18, 2011.

BLAIR GABLE/Reuters

When New Democrats more than doubled their historic best on election night, the constituency Jack Layton's party represents was radically transformed. They broke through in Quebec and won 59 seats, more than any single party has taken in the province since Brian Mulroney in 1988 - before the birth of the Bloc Québécois. Accordingly, the NDP constituency has gone from being overwhelmingly English-speaking and more diverse than the national average to mostly French-speaking and less multicultural.

These are the findings of an analysis of the changing face of the NDP constituency, a comparison of the demographic profile of the ridings represented by New Democratic MPs before and after the May 2 federal election.

With a gain of 67 seats on election night, the NDP went from representing 3.8 million Canadians to 11.2 million, or roughly one-third of the country's population.

Story continues below advertisement

In the process, the regional weight of the NDP's caucus drawn from the West, Ontario, and Atlantic Canada was reduced dramatically - despite the party's gains in each region. While the NDP increased its Western caucus from 14 to 16 seats, that now represents less than 16 per cent of the entire NDP caucus. Prior to the election, the West contributed almost two out of every five NDP seats.

With five seat gains in Ontario, the party's caucus is still only 21.4 per cent from that province, while the two seat gains in Atlantic Canada come with a reduction in the region's weight to only 6 per cent of all NDP seats.

Prior to the election, the one NDP seat in Quebec represented less than 3 per cent of its national caucus. Now, the 59 New Democrat MPs make up the majority (57.3 per cent) of the party.

Vancouver, Hamilton, Toronto, and Winnipeg were the four most important urban centres for the party prior to the election. But now the NDP's representation from the Greater Montreal region dwarfs the relatively smaller block of MPs drawn from Toronto, Vancouver, and Quebec City, which along with Montreal are now the most important centres for the NDP.

With the shift toward Quebec, the New Democrats now represents an older population. The median age of the NDP's constituents before the election was 39.2 years, slightly below the national median age of 39.5 years. The median age of those the party now represents is 40.2 years. The New Democrats nevertheless still represent some younger ridings. The northern Manitoba riding of Churchill, for example, has a median age of only 26.4 years.

The NDP's constituents are still poorer than the national average, with a median household income of $49,000 per year. That is a small drop from the $50,000 per year for the ridings Jack Layton's party held before the election.

But it is in the linguistic profile of people the NDP now represents that we find the most change. In the 36 ridings held by the New Democrats before the election, English was the mother tongue of 66.1 per cent, well above the national proportion of 57.2 per cent. Only 7.9 per cent of the NDP's constituents were native French speakers, while 24.3 per cent had a mother tongue other than English or French.

Story continues below advertisement

Now that more than half of the NDP's seats are based in Quebec, 51.1 per cent of their constituents are native French-speakers, a more than six fold increase. This is aided by the large French-speaking populations living in NDP ridings in Northern Ontario and New Brunswick. The proportion of English speakers has dropped to less than one-third, while speakers of a language other than French or English now make up less than 17 per cent of the NDP's constituency, below the national average.

Similarly, the proportion of immigrants living in ridings represented by NDP MPs has shrunk from 22 per cent - more than the national average of 19.8 per cent - to 15.7 per cent, while visible minorities now make up only 13.2 per cent of the NDP's constituency, a drop from 17.8 per cent prior to the election. The proportion of Canadians with a university education in the party's ridings has also dropped below the national average.

Another significant change has been the decrease in the proportion of aboriginals among the NDP's constituents. Whereas 7 per cent of the NDP's constituency prior to the election was aboriginal, far in excess of the 3.8 per cent that aboriginals represent in the total Canadian population, only 3.2 per cent of the NDP's new constituency is aboriginal. However, nine of their ridings still have large aboriginal populations of 10,000 or more.

The profile of the New Democratic Party has fundamentally changed. The NDP never had any significant representation from Quebec before, but it is now a Quebec-based party. In effect, roughly four out of every five seats in Quebec were grafted onto the NDP's pre-election caucus, with a handful of seats in other parts of the country added to the mix. How the New Democrats will cope with suddenly being a party that represents a francophone-majority population will likely shape their next four years as the Official Opposition and their electoral fortunes in 2015.

Éric Grenier writes about politics and polls at ThreeHundredEight.com . The changing Liberal constituency was investigated last week. Next week, we turn to the Conservatives.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies