Skip to main content

We've entered an era of indifference where the "two solitudes" are more separate than ever. It's like a couple that has drifted so far apart the partners don't even feel the need to quarrel.

Quebeckers have lost the thin interest they had about the rest of Canada, where, on the other hand, there is a growing feeling of irritation mounting against Quebec – Quebec and its fat equalization payments that serve to finance fancy programs like $7-a-day daycare. This anger is still muted and expressed in rather polite terms – this is English Canada after all – but it is bound to increase as the centre of gravity moves to the West.

Ontario and Quebec (or at least their respective political elites) were once the backbone of the old order – the guardians of what used to be called "national unity" – but Ontario is broke and is now turning inward. Quebec is even more broke and even more self-centred than it used to be.

Story continues below advertisement

The last census shows that more people live west of Ontario than east of it. Quite logically, it is the West that calls the shots. For the first time in Canadian history, the federal government is a direct emanation of the West, and its policies reflect a socially conservative yet economically dynamic Western culture.

How long will the equalization system resist the "westernization" of the country? The West has become the country's economic powerhouse. Unlike Ontarians, Western Canadians never paid much attention to Quebec and never anguished over the question of "what Quebec wanted." The distance is too great, geographically and culturally, and it doesn't help that Quebec demonizes the resources industry and the tar sands to which Quebeckers actually owe their standard of living.

Some days ago, a group of academics from Toronto and Montreal met in Toronto to try and revisit the constitutional wars of the 1970s and 80s, and discuss how Canadians might be convinced to reopen the Constitution so that, among other changes, Quebec could be recognized as a "nation." No one among the hundred constitutional experts present thought it would be possible.

And frankly, they shouldn't have gone through the trouble of organizing the conference, since the answer was highly predictable. In both Quebec and the rest of Canada, the word "Constitution" is essentially a dirty word that practically nobody wants to hear – except maybe the constitutional experts who'd like to revive their careers.

Political scientist David Cameron, one of the organizers of the conference, said his stomach turned when he heard, at the meeting, former PQ premier Bernard Landry and former Liberal minister Brian Tobin rehash the same old debate with the same old arguments.

Let the Constitution rest. Reopening it would turn into a horrible slugfest, with every province and every pressure group demanding their own amendments.

And the recognition of Quebec as a nation would not even kill the separatist movement. The sovereigntists were unhappy with Meech and never really wanted constitutional reform from the beginning. All they did was exploit the failure of Meech because it served their goal of painting Canada in a bad light.

Story continues below advertisement

If, by some miracle, a brand-new constitution filled with loving words for Quebec were brought to them on a silver plate, they would say it's too little too late. And this makes sense. If you want Quebec to have the full powers of an independent country, why would you settle for a lame compromise?

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies