Skip to main content

Minister of Democratic Institutions Maryam Monsef answers a question during question period in the House of Commons, on Parliament Hill, in Ottawa, on Friday, Dec. 11, 2015. Monsef is vowing to reduce the impact of money on federal politics amid new evidence that advocacy groups are becoming much more active in trying to influence the outcome of elections.

Sean Kilpatrick/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Democratic Institutions Minister Maryam Monsef is vowing to reduce the impact of money on federal politics amid new evidence that advocacy groups are becoming much more active in trying to influence the outcome of elections.

Financial reports filed with Elections Canada by so-called third parties show 104 groups, primarily labour unions, spent just over $6 million during last fall's marathon campaign.

That's more than twice the number of groups that were involved in the 2011 federal election and almost five times more money.

Story continues below advertisement

And that doesn't include any money spent in the months before the election was called, during which political spending was not regulated.

In a statement to The Canadian Press, Monsef vowed: "We will ensure that spending rules — both during and between elections — are in keeping with our democratic commitment to make voters, not dollars, determine the outcome of elections."

A controversial overhaul of election rules in 2014 by the previous Conservative government allows political parties, their candidates and third parties to increase their spending limits by 1/37th for every day a campaign exceeds the minimum length of 37 days.

While modern campaigns, including the 2011 campaign, have typically stuck close to the minimum length, former prime minister Stephen Harper chose to make the last campaign a marathon of 78 days.

That made the 2015 campaign "one of the longest in Canadian history" and resulted in "significant increases in the spending limits of political entities," Monsef noted.

Monsef's statement and her reference to "political entities" appears to go further than the Liberal election platform, which promised to close the "loophole" created by the Conservatives' fixed date election law, which allows unlimited spending in the run-up to a pre-determined campaign.

The platform promised to ensure that spending between elections is subject to limits and also to review limits on how much parties can spend during elections.

Story continues below advertisement

It did not make any specific mention of third party spending during elections.

The third parties in the 2015 campaign included a number of progressive groups who advocated strategic voting to defeat Harper's Conservatives, as well as some individuals. Their spending ranged from as little as $136.66 to a high of $431,640.

According to the reports filed with Elections Canada, the top ten third party spenders during the last campaign were:

— United Steelworkers: $431,640

— Let's Build Canada, a coalition of building trade construction unions advocating for public investments in infrastructure: $428,975

— Canadians United for Change, a union-linked organization: $425,462.

Story continues below advertisement

— Public Service Alliance of Canada: $390.236.

— Friends of Canadian Broadcasting: $332,687.

— Canadian Labour Congress: $306,518.

— Unifor: $299,902.

— British Columbia Nurses Union: $256,872.

— Canadian Media Guild: $237,033.

Story continues below advertisement

— Canadian Union of Postal Workers: $208,572.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies