Skip to main content

MP Claude Patry, centre, walks with Bloc Québécois MPs on Parliament Hill in Ottawa on Thursday. Feb 28, 2013.

SEAN KILPATRICK/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The defection of a federal New Democrat politician to the Bloc Québécois has given new life to Conservative accusations that sovereigntist sentiments are festering on the benches of the NDP.

Prime Minister Stephen Harper ended a news conference in Rivière-du-Loup, Que., on Thursday by making note of the decision of Claude Patry, the MP for Jonquière-Alma, to quit the NDP and sit with the four members of the Bloc.

"I am somewhat concerned, but I can say it's not a big surprise," he said without being prompted by a question from reporters. "There is a certain ambiguity within the NDP caucus in Quebec as to Canadian unity. There are a lot of connections between the NDP Quebec caucus and Quebec Solidaire [a provincial separatist party], and I am not surprised to see this type of development."

Story continues below advertisement

The move by Mr. Patry spells more trouble for NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair, who must sell his party as the federalist option in Quebec while being careful not to offend the soft nationalists in that province whose support lifted his party to the rank of Official Opposition.

Mr. Patry was first elected in 2011 as part of the so-called Orange Wave that saw large numbers of Quebec voters abandon the Bloc to support then NDP leader Jack Layton. Some of those new MPs have subsequently been asked to explain their separatist ties.

Nycole Turmel, who served as interim leader of the NDP following the death of Mr. Layton, was forced to admit being a card-carrying member of the Bloc Québécois and Québec Solidaire, a party that also been supported financially by Alexandre Boulerice, the NDP MP for Rosemont-La Petite-Patrie.

In announcing his defection, Mr. Patry made his own leanings clear. "I voted for Quebec sovereignty in the last two referendums. I hoped that Quebec should become a country and I still hope for that," he said in a statement. Mr. Patry said it was the NDP position on Quebec secession that pushed him to the Bloc. The New Democrats recently introduced a private member's bill that says any referendum question on separation would have to be acceptable to both the federal and provincial governments. Mr. Patry said he does not believe the federal government should have veto power over the wording. The NDP position, he said, "demonstrates unequivocally that the party favours Canada's interest over those of the Quebec nation."

For his part, Mr. Mulcair reminded reporters that the New Democrat policy on separation, which also says a simple majority of 50 per cent plus one in a referendum would be enough to trigger negotiations around Quebec separation, was spelled out in a 2005 party document called the Sherbrook Declaration. "Claude ran on that platform, he defended it, he's always agreed with it," he said.

Mr. Mulcair also pointed out that Mr. Patry had voted in favour of an NDP motion that would declare the seat of a politician who defected from one party to another to be vacant. He called upon Mr. Patry "to step down from his seat in Jonquière-Alma and run in a by-election if he thinks that the people of his riding support him."

But when asked if there could be other people within the federal NDP who share Mr. Patry's separatist inclinations, the New Democrat Leader ducked the question.

Story continues below advertisement

It is not the first time that the federal New Democrats have lost a Quebec caucus member since their success in the 2011 election. Lise St-Denis, the MP for Saint-Maurice-Champlain, moved to the Liberals a year ago.

Nik Nanos, president of the polling firm Nanos Research, said Mr. Patry's defection highlights the reality that, in Quebec, the NDP is more of a popular front against Stephen Harper than a unified voice for the party's social democratic policies.

"This former NDP caucus member is saying that he is a sovereigntist and he believes in a separatist Quebec," Mr. Nanos said. "So [Mr. Mulcair] has to manage that because then the question is, are there other NDP caucus members that may have the same view as this individual?"

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies