Skip to main content

In this file photo, Ripudaman Singh Malik (centre) leaves B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver, B.C. on March 16, 2005.

Richard Lam/The Canadian Press

Conservative partisans deliberately drowned out a journalist's question to Mr. Harper during a Greater Toronto Area campaign stop Saturday as he was being asked about a Vancouver candidate's endorsement by a man acquitted in the Air India bombing.

The Tory Leader stood quietly while members of his staff and a crowd of about 500 at a Coptic Christian centre clapped and cheered loudly to prevent a CBC reporter from quizzing him further on his defence of Vancouver South candidate Wai Young.

The Liberals have complained about an early April parents' meeting at Khalsa School in the Vancouver area, saying Ripudaman Singh Malik was present and urged attendees to vote for Ms. Young and not Grit candidate Ujjal Dosanjh.

Story continues below advertisement

Ms. Young has said she didn't know of Mr. Malik's background or his relationship with the Khalsa school, which he helped found.

Mr. Harper repeated this defence Saturday but ignored a follow-up question on the matter.

"She attended in good faith. She has been very clear. She and her campaign have no links and do not welcome in any way Mr. Malik into this party," the Conservative Leader said.

"We're absolutely clear about that."

A reporter tried to press Mr. Harper on, this asking whether he "really believed" that Ms. Young would not know Mr. Malik, who's been in the public spotlight for decades due to scrutiny on him after the 1985 airplane bombing that claimed 329 lives.

But the Conservative Leader refused to answer this follow-up query, waiting as the crowd at the Coptic Christian Centre in Mississauga applauded and cheered him for about 60 seconds.

It's the first time a Conservative crowd has purposely drowned out a reporter's question of Mr. Harper during the 41st election campaign.

Story continues below advertisement

Tory staffers encouraged the crowd. Among those doing so was Marc-Andre Plouffe, who before the campaign was a senior advisor in the Prime Minister's Office.

On Friday, the Conservative Party issued a statement saying that Mr. Malik "is not involved in the Conservative candidate in Vancouver South's campaign, nor that of any other Conservative party candidate.

"The Conservative party candidate in Vancouver-South was unaware of Ripudaman Singh Malik's background or relationship with the Khalsa School. The invitation to speak at the Khalsa School was extended to her by its principal, not by Ripudaman Singh Malik."

On Thursday, the Supreme Court of Canada cleared the way for the B.C. government to try to wrest $5.2-million in legal fees from Mr. Malik.

The court ruled the province can unseal and examine documents it previously seized from the Vancouver businessman. The materials were seized in connection with a lawsuit the province launched alleging that the Malik family systematically misrepresented its considerable wealth to defraud the public of special legal funding made available to Mr. Malik.

The Supreme Court's decision reversed an earlier B.C. Court of Appeal decision that had gone in Mr. Malik's favour.

Story continues below advertisement

The questions surrounding Mr. Malik's support of Ms. Young is the second controversy the Conservatives have faced in recent days about candidate endorsements.

In a rare act of dissent Thursday, Conservative cabinet minister Peter Kent criticized his own party for allowing a man who hosted a tribute to the Tamil Tigers to run as a candidate.

"It is certainly a reflection on the party's lack of due diligence,"

Mr. Kent told The Globe and Mail earlier this week, referring to the candidacy of Gavan Paranchothy, a Tamil broadcaster running in Toronto's Scarborough-Southwest riding. "Someone's obviously dropped the ball."

Last November, Mr. Paranchothy hosted a sombre program to mark Heroes Day, an annual commemoration of Tiger fighters killed in the Tamils' bloody separatist war in Sri Lanka. He called the dead militants "freedom fighters" and "heroes," though Stephen Harper's Conservative government labelled the Tigers terrorists in 2006.

"This program … is unacceptable and it flies in the face of the fact that our government listed the Tamil Tigers as a terrorist organization," said Mr. Kent, a former foreign correspondent and the current Environment Minister, after he watched the program on YouTube, where it has been displayed for nearly five months.

Story continues below advertisement

On Saturday Mr. Harper would only say that Mr. Paranchothy's "position is real clear and for a long time he's been rejecting the Tamil Tigers and this government has been the one that put this organization on the terrorism [watch]list."

With files from Anthony Reinhart and Kirk Makin

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies