Skip to main content

Politics Trudeau’s reforms do nothing to improve Senate's legitimacy, Christy Clark says

British Columbia Premier Christy Clark is shown in Vancouver.

Darryl Dyck/The Canadian Press

British Columbia's premier says the Trudeau government's plans for a more independent, non-partisan Senate will make the much-maligned institution even worse than it already is.

Christy Clark says the new process for appointing senators on merit will give legitimacy to an unelected, unaccountable upper house in which her province will remain grossly under-represented.

B.C. gets only six senators in the 105-seat chamber, although it's the third largest province with a population of about 4.7 million.

Story continues below advertisement

By contrast, the three tiny maritime provinces, with less than two million people combined, are entitled to 24 senators, as are Ontario and Quebec.

Democratic Institutions Minister Maryam Monsef announced last week the creation of an independent, five-member advisory board to recommend a short list of five non-partisan nominees to fill each vacancy in the Senate.

Two of the board's members are to represent the province in which the vacancy arises, but Clark told the Global TV show West Block that her government won't participate in the new process because it doesn't want to validate it.

"The process doesn't make the Senate any better," Clark told host Tom Clark.

"I would argue that it actually makes it worse because the Senate is completely unrepresentative of the provinces."

Clark added: "The Senate doesn't work now. The only other thing that could make the Senate worse would be having all of these unaccountable, unelected patronage appointments starting to think that they are somehow legitimate and have the power to make decisions on behalf of our country.

"They don't. They shouldn't ... And we won't endorse it."

Story continues below advertisement

While provincial governments will be consulted on the provincial members of the advisory board, the federal government can proceed without their participation if need be.

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has argued that his approach is the only practical way to achieve concrete change in the Senate without getting bogged down in divisive constitutional wrangling with the provinces. His objective is to eliminate the partisanship that he believes has eroded the Senate's ability to fulfil its intended role as an independent chamber of sober second thought.

The Supreme Court has ruled that more dramatic reforms – such as altering the Senate's regional representation, imposing term limits, or requiring the election of senators – would require a constitutional amendment approved by at least seven provinces with 50 per cent of the population. Abolition of the chamber would require unanimous consent.

Nevertheless, Clark reiterated her view that the Senate should be fixed or folded. She acknowledged that would be "hard to do" but said it's preferable to legitimizing senators who are unaccountable to Canadians until they retire at age 75.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter