Skip to main content

General view of Downsview Park on Keele St., Toronto. Councillor Maria Augimeri and mayoral candidate David Soknacki have expressed concerns about the federal government’s plans for the park.

Fernando Morales/The Globe and Mail

A Toronto councillor is asking Ottawa to hand over control of Downsview Park to the city, describing the federal government's handling of the park as "shrouded in secrecy."

Councillor Maria Augimeri told reporters Monday that she's concerned that the federal government – through its real-estate company Canada Lands Co., which runs the park – has plans to sell off more of the park than was previously agreed upon by the city. As a result, she said, the city should take ownership of the park.

"This park that you see behind me is the last remaining large space in Toronto made up of mature wood lots, open green space, recreational areas, and most of it has mass, massive potential," she said. "However, it seems that the federal government, all it sees here are dollar signs."

Story continues below advertisement

In 2012, Toronto city council and the federal government agreed to sell off enough of the land to build 10,000 new housing units, but keep 363 acres of the approximately 572-acre park as recreational space.

Ms. Augimeri said that Ottawa has since expressed an interest in revisiting that agreement for potentially more development – but would not say why she believed this to be the case, beyond saying it was leaked to her. Her comments were made after reports last week suggesting that officials in Ottawa were concerned about plans for the future of the park.

The Canada Lands Co. did not immediately respond to requests for comment Monday.

Of the 10,000 housing units, about 1,500 have already been sold as part of the Stanley Greene community being built on the west side of the park. Ms. Augimeri said that, even if Ottawa does not hand over control, she'd like to see the remaining five communities – and 8,500 units – halted.

"You don't do it to High Park," she said. "How can you do it to Downsview?"

Toronto mayoral candidate and former chair of the Downsview Park board David Soknacki appeared at Ms. Augimeri's side Monday to echo her concerns.

"By revisiting that agreement, that could further encroach on the public realm, and certainly encroach on the densities that are coming forward," he said, adding that he'd received the same information as Ms. Augimeri about Ottawa's interest in selling off more of the park.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Soknacki disagreed with Ms. Augimeri on halting the remaining 8,500 units, however, saying that the sale of that land would go towards maintenance of the park.

Several Downsview-area residents also appeared at Ms. Augimeri's side Monday, saying they didn't want more development in the park.

"It's a beautiful park. Why do they have to ruin it?" said Maria Cutulle, who has lived in the area for 45 years. "We don't have any more big parks in the city."

Follow me on Twitter: @annhui

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.