Skip to main content

Toronto's Chief Budget Officer Councillor Frank Di Giorgio shares a moment with Toronto Mayor Rob Ford during a budget meeting at City Hall in Toronto, January 30, 2014.

AARON HARRIS/REUTERS

It was not all sharp words and political point-scoring during this week's two-day budget debate at Toronto city council.

While councillors sparred over spending, Mayor Rob Ford and the man he appointed to chair the budget committee, Frank Di Giorgio, were photographed on Thursday sharing a moment at the front of the chamber to the side of the Speaker's chair.

Mr. Di Giorgio, traditionally an ally of the city's controversial mayor, has faced a barrage of criticism from Mr. Ford, who called the spending plan the councillor had worked on for months "the worst budget ever."

Story continues below advertisement

While it looked in the photograph like the veteran councillor was tickling the mayor, Mr. Di Giorgio said that is not exactly what happened.

"It looks like a ticklefest, but that's not what it was," Mr. Di Giorgio explained on Friday after the photo drew attention on websites including The Globe and Mail.

"He has been angry with me because I've been promoting something other than what he wanted."

To help get over that, Mr. Di Giorgio, who, like the mayor, has coached high school football, said he asked Mr. Ford if he wanted to line up against him in a "three-point stance," like players on a scrimmage line.

When he put out his hands, he knocked the mayor into the wall, and that, he said, is what was captured by the cameras.

Mr. Ford, who has been working out and has shed 40 pounds, is by far the heavyweight of the pair, but Mr. Di Giorgio figures he would be the winner on the football field if it came to that.

"I have way more dexterity," he said.

Story continues below advertisement

In the end, the budget chair took the unusual step of voting with the mayor and against his own budget. Mr. Di Giorgio said he wanted a lower tax increase than the 2.23 per cent council approved and also wanted a reduction to the land transfer tax.

"Because of that, I thought, 'You know what, I'm going to vote against it,'" he said. "I knew it was going to carry anyway."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies