Skip to main content

Maria Augimeri, a Toronto city councillor, goes over an Ontario Fire Marshal's report with Toronto media on Aug. 4, 2010.

Sarah Dea/The Globe and Mail

Toronto councillors have voted for the city to pay the legal costs of council candidate Gus Cusimano, after the integrity commissioner found that Councillor Maria Augimeri – who is running against Mr. Cusimano – breached the code of conduct by calling him a "criminal."

A report from Integrity Commissioner Janet Leiper last week found that, in keeping with the city's protocol, Mr. Cusimano's legal fees up to $5,000 should be covered by the city. After a lively debate – including the protestation of Mayor Rob Ford and his brother Councillor Doug Ford – council voted 30 to 4 to accept Ms. Leiper's recommendations.

At issue in Tuesday's debate is a February 2014 article in an Italian-language newspaper, where Ms. Augimeri said "The people do not want to be represented by a criminal." Mr. Cusimano has no criminal record, but was found guilty of breaching the Municipal Elections Act in 2010. Ms. Augimeri later apologized and provided a retraction of her comment.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Cusimano hired a lawyer to assist in filing the complaint to the integrity commissioner.

Several councillors spoke in support of Ms. Leiper's recommendations Tuesday, saying that the city should follow its own rules for such situations.

"We do have a global budget that takes care of surprise costs related to how councillors perform their duties," Councillor Gord Perks said. "That would include lawsuits, and there are lawsuits all the time, often frivolous ones. I was once sued for putting a swing set in a park."

And Councillor John Parker urged council not to break policy, either. "Now is not the time to say we don't like the policy," he said. "Right now, we are here to apply the policy."

But Mayor Ford and Councillor Doug Ford accused their colleagues of playing politics, describing the decision as an "abuse" of taxpayers' money.

"Why should the taxpayers pick up his bill when one of our members of council was wrong – made a very serious accusation, was found guilty, and we sit back now and say 'taxpayers' are going to pay for it?'" said the mayor, who tried, but failed, to move a motion for Ms. Augimeri to pay the costs out of her own pocket.

And Councillor Ford described the decision as a "double standard."

Story continues below advertisement

"I've said stuff wrong in the past, I've apologized, and I've had to pay," he said. "So we've just set a precedent that every councillor's above the law, they get to go out and call anyone any derogatory name, accuse them of false names, and they're covered by the taxpayers and it's not fair to the taxpayers."

Meanwhile, Mr. Cusimano said he thinks Ms. Augimeri should pay the costs out of her own pocket, too. "She's the one who was found to be in breach. She's the one who admitted to knowingly making falsehoods, so she should pay for it," he said.

Mr. Cusimano, who ran against Ms. Augimeri in 2010– but declined to respond when asked how many times he has run for council in the past – said that he's yet to finalize the total cost of his legal fees. He said it won't likely cost the full $5,000, though.

"It was wrong. I was bullied," he said. "Not only was I bullied, but my whole family name was tarnished by her remarks."

In an interview Tuesday, Ms. Augimeri said she apologized and retracted her comments out of respect for Ms. Leiper.

"She told me to apologize. I respect her, I apologized," she said.

Story continues below advertisement

But she also appeared to stand by her original comments.

"He broke the law," she said. "He's shameless. He broke the law. He can't get around it. He can't hide from the fact that he broke the law and he broke public trust."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter