Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

In the new documentary “Unclaimed,” Tom Faunce, a Vietnam War veteran and humanitarian, seeks the true identity of a man claiming to be an American MIA and vows to reunite him with his family.

Myth Merchant Films

The Edmonton-based, Emmy-winning filmmaker of a controversial documentary about a U.S. soldier said to have been stranded in Vietnam since mid-1968 wants the U.S. government to release to the man's family all the research it claims to have done on the soldier's identity since at least 1991.

Michael Jorgensen was responding in a telephone interview on Wednesday evening in response to recent reports that John Hartley Robertson, who is featured in his film, Unclaimed, is in fact a mixed-race Asian named Dang Tan Ngoc – not the Alabama-born Green Beret who was left for dead on a mountain in Laos after a top-secret but ultimately disastrous helicopter rescue mission.

Unclaimed, which traces the efforts of another Vietnam War veteran, Tom Faunce of Michigan, to find and identify the real Mr. Robertson, had its world premiere earlier this week at the Hot Docs festival in Toronto. Screenings are scheduled for Thursday and Saturday, then it moves to Washington, D.C., for its U.S. debut on May 12 at the G.I. Film Festival.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Jorgensen said there is evidence that the U.S. government undertook investigations in 1991, 2001, 2003 and again in 2006 and 2009. "Why was the family never involved?" he asked. For example, according to the website Professional Soldiers, which is run by current and former Green Berets, U.S. missionaries took hair samples from the man who is said to be Mr. Robertson in February, 2009, and passed them on to lab technicians for DNA comparison with "family reference samples" obtained earlier by the U.S. military. These tests determined there was no match.

However, Mr. Jorgensen said, none of Mr. Robertson's immediate family – three sisters and one brother, only one of whom, an 80-year-old sister, is still alive – ever recalled providing such samples. The division of the U.S. military that investigates the cases of missing members of forces has not "even reached out to them as of today and said, 'Here's all that we did.'" In the film, Mr. Faunce has an enamel isotope test done on one of Mr. Robertson's molars that indicates he was raised in the United States.

The surviving sibling, Jean Robertson-Holley, is convinced the man in Vietnam is her long-lost brother, even though he speaks mainly Vietnamese, as does her daughter, Gail Metcalf.

Unclaimed's climax is a tear-filled reunion in Canada of Ms. Robertson-Holley and the man she believes is her brother. (Mr. Robertson – or Dang Tan Ngoc – is back in Vietnam, with the Vietnamese woman he says he married after she nursed him back to health following the mission.)

"If he's a fraud, I'm not sure how he convinced his family and a guy he served with that he's somebody he's not by his physical appearance and the information that he knows," Mr. Jorgensen said. In a Facebook posting last week, Mr. Jorgensen wrote: "The film was not produced to help perpetrate fraud of any kind or misrepresent anyone's identity."

Representatives for both Hot Docs and the G.I. festival said Wednesday they will not pull Unclaimed. The Washington event will issue a statement informing the audience about "the objections to the film and its content." Hot Docs said it selected Unclaimed because of its ambiguity and complexity. "We trust our audiences will approach the film with open minds."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies