Skip to main content

Toronto Mayor Rob Ford, centre, speaks to the media at city hall in Toronto, Monday, Nov. 26, 2012.

CP

Two cities, two ousted mayors, and there the similarities end.

In Quebec, observers noted that the controversy that cost Toronto Mayor Robert Ford his job paled into comparison with the municipal scandals unfolding in Montreal and elsewhere.

Quebec newspapers featured Mr. Ford's ouster but couldn't help drawing comparisons with the shocking tales of vice unfolding at the Charbonneau Commission.

Story continues below advertisement

"Oh! Toronto! Them too! » wrote La Presse columnist Yves Boisvert on Tuesday. But he said Quebeckers should rein in their joy at watching Toronto's troubles.

Montreal mayor Gérald Tremblay resigned this month because of the depth of corruption that was eating away at his city, Mr. Boisvert wrote.

He and others noted that the rules in Ontario are a lot tougher than in Quebec, and Mr. Ford was forced out for a minor conflict-of-interest breach.

"The strictness of the Ontario law only reinforces the feeling that some Quebec mayors are taking advantage of a system that's too lenient," he said.

In Le Devoir, editorial writer Josée Boileau noted the same contrast between the two provinces. She, too, felt that Mr. Ford stepped down for a minor matter.

"In Quebec, even being accused of fraud isn't enough to push out a mayor, as Mascouche Mayor Richard Marcotte proves," she said, referring to a mayor in suburban Montreal.

Summarizing the tougher rules in Ontario, and the fact Toronto has had an integrity commissioner since 2004, she concluded: "Yes, Ontario has some lessons to teach us."

Story continues below advertisement

The Montreal Gazette also found that Mr. Ford's transgressions are "in a very different league from the allegations of criminal misdeeds made at the Charbonneau Commission." Its headline on its story read: "An enforcement tale of two cities."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies