Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

Huge swath of Toronto will see residential speed limit decrease to 30 km/h

Motorists make their way along a residential street in the Beach area in Toronto, Ont. Friday, April 27/2012. The speed limit will start to drop to 30 km/h on hundreds of kilometres of Toronto’s residential streets this fall, in a bid to improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists.

Kevin Van Paassen/The Globe and Mail

The speed limit will start to drop to 30 km/h on hundreds of kilometres of Toronto's residential streets this fall, in a bid to improve safety for pedestrians and cyclists.

The politically controversial idea sailed through Toronto and East York community council Monday evening in spite of opposition voiced earlier by the mayor, who does not get a vote on this body. The unanimous decision of these councillors is binding on local roads across their 12 wards, representing a huge swath of the city, "We have an expectation to protect our neighbourhoods," said Councillor Josh Matlow, who introduced the motion dropping residential limits‎. "It's not going to stop people speeding...but it's going to contribute."

The decision affects about 387 kilometres of local roads in the old cities of Toronto and East York that are now posted at 40 km/h. Staff estimated that changing the signs will cost about $1-million and take three years. Councillors specified that the switch is to begin in September.

Story continues below advertisement

"There is no war on the car," argued Councillor Paula Fletcher. "There's basically been this continued war on people who don't have a car."

Lower speeds are known to reduce sharply the risk to pedestrians and cyclists in the event of a crash. A person hit at 32 km/h has a 95 per cent chance of survival, according to data cited by the U.S. Department of Transportation. Their odds drop to 60 per cent if hit at 48 km/h.

"Errors in judgement should not be punished with the death sentence," said Albert Koehl, speaking to the community council on behalf of the Annex Residents' Association.

In the lead-up to the meeting, the idea of dropping the limit prompted pushback from city staff, as well as from Mayor John Tory and some members of his executive committee.

‎Mr. Tory said he is not in favour of lowering limits across the board, arguing for a more targeted approach in individual neighbourhoods.

"I don't generally favour these kind of blanket solutions that make people feel better for a short period of time, but then you look and say 'is it being enforced, is it actually being effective? Is it achieving the ends that are stated when it's under review', and the answer comes up no," he said.

Funding to continue replacing speed limit signs after this year will have to be secured as part of the budget process that involves full council. This could offer a chance for councillors from elsewhere in the city to derail this push, though Mr. Matlow was hopeful that would not happen.

Story continues below advertisement

"I would hope that the mayor and council would respect the decision of the Toronto East York community council," he said.

Transportation Services general manager Stephen Buckley was also dubious about a broad reduction in speed limits, raising concerns Monday evening as he walked councillors through the staff report on the issue.

He noted that drivers often adjust their speed in response ‎to the road design and conditions, not responding only to the posted limit. Using what he characterized as artificial or arbitrarily low limits could lead to non-compliance, driver frustration and speed differentials between vehicles that could raise the risk of collisions.

With a report from Ann Hui

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

If your comment doesn't appear immediately it has been sent to a member of our moderation team for review

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading…

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.