Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Mayor Rob Ford climbs a play structure and chats with a group of Summer Campers with the Wellesley Community Centre at the newly opened Underpass park in Toronto, August 02, 2012.

Deborah Baic/The Globe and Mail

The latest plans for revitalizing Toronto's Port Lands blend existing industrial uses with the original vision of parkland and residential and commercial development – a change made at the insistence of local businesses and the Toronto Port Authority.

A revised proposal for the massive waterfront site envisions park users strolling on dock-side promenades against a backdrop of freighters tied up for winter or unloading cargo.

"The most boring waterfronts I've ever seen are the ones where they've razed everything and just built condos. Boring. No soul," said John Campbell, head of Waterfront Toronto, the three-government agency charged with transforming the site. "It's important to have what I call the theatre of the harbour."

Story continues below advertisement

The addition of this "theatre" is the latest twist in the political drama surrounding plans for the 1,000-acre site – plans that captured public attention last year when the mayor's brother balked at the high cost and slow pace of Waterfront Toronto's work and put forward an alternative that included a mono-rail, Ferris wheel and mega-mall.

As a compromise, Waterfront Toronto and the city joined forces and are ready with a new design and business plan to kick-start development. Industry and public advisory groups got the first peek this week, and a public meeting is planned for Aug. 8.

The latest changes are a variation by the original designer of his award-winning plans, which would have created a naturalized mouth for the Don River with parks along its bank and jutting into the harbour. That plan required the demolition of dock walls and did not take into account industrial users, including a large cement facility on private land.

"When the proponents came up with the vision, there's no way they could have forecast all the things in our complicated world that they had to accommodate," Mr. Campbell said.

Councillor Paula Fletcher, whose ward includes the Port Lands, said users and land owners at a meeting on Thursday were receptive to the latest changes. "What we are ending up with is an interesting compromise," she said. The revisions now include lush parks along the river, she said, placed in an "interesting urban space."

John Wilson, a long-time Don River advocate and an advisory group member, said people were aware of existing users, but assumed issues would be resolved in time, given the decades-long plan for redevelopment.

He called the new plans "encouraging." Revisions include leaving portions of the dock wall, while "softening" some of the shoreline, he said, as well as eliminating the promontory park and naturalizing only one side of the river, opposite the Lafarge Canada Ltd. cement facility. The area will be developed in phases, beginning with a "spillway" for the Don flood waters and elevating roadways to remove land from the flood plain and allow development, he said.

Story continues below advertisement

As early as 18 months ago, there were clear indications the original plan needed changes. A February, 2011, letter from the Toronto Port Authority to the Ministry of the Environment identified the "navigation risk" posed by a promontory. Letters on behalf of Lafarge protested that the design would eliminate its operations at the west end of the Port Lands. Redpath Sugar Ltd., which operates nearby, noted that it stores raw sugar in vessels moored to the dock walls in winter. By April, 2011, Waterfront Toronto and the Toronto Regional Conservation Authority acknowledged in documents to the ministry that "mitigation with regard to effects on private property owners, including Lafarge," was needed. That was not raised last year when citizens and councillors rallied behind the original Port Lands plan.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies