Skip to main content

According to information obtained by The Globe and Mail, Toronto councillors were told that the best approach for the downtown relief line involves a connection from Pape Station, on the Danforth line, to the area around City Hall.

Fred Lum/The Globe and Mail

Plans for downtown Toronto's first subway in decades are taking shape, with the city's planning department urging that it run below Queen Street.

Details of the long-awaited downtown relief line – a route that has been discussed in various permutations for a century – emerged on Friday. According to information obtained by The Globe and Mail, staff have concluded that the best approach involves a connection from Pape Station near Danforth Avenue to the area around City Hall.

Although the plan is primarily about diverting passengers from the overcrowded Yonge subway line, a briefing for councillors made clear the value of the new line to the city centre as well. According to a draft staff presentation, the subway plan would "fill [a] rapid transit void in the core" and "recognizes that downtown is 24/7."

Story continues below advertisement

The proposal pencils in stations along Queen Street around Sherbourne Street, Sumach Street and Broadview Avenue, and one near Gerrard Square. These would allow access to Regent Park and Moss Park, and offer the chance of a connection to the Stouffville GO corridor, which is expected to get much more frequent service under provincial and city plans.

Ridership projections for the proposed line are expected in the next few weeks, and the plan itself will form part of a broader package of transit proposals going to city council in June. Future extensions would push the line farther north and west. But no funding for any of it has been secured, and construction of even the first phase would likely take at least a decade.

Surging ridership on the Yonge subway line in recent years has made clear the importance of a downtown relief line. Officials including Toronto Transit Commission CEO Andy Byford and the city's chief planner, Jennifer Keesmaat, have repeatedly described the relief line as the city's top transit priority. Mayor John Tory, who ran on a more immediate plan to relieve the subway by adding service on local GO rail corridors, has said the DRL would still be needed in the longer term.

"We have to take action now," said Councillor Josh Matlow, one of the stronger voices at city hall arguing for the DRL.

"As Toronto's finally moving on expanding our rapid transit system … based on growth projections, the relief line addresses an existing condition that's getting worse every year. Many of our streetcar lines, along with the Yonge [subway] line, are already overcrowded."

The preferred alignment that emerged on Friday – which must still go through a public consultation process and be formally recommended to council – would avoid adding passengers to the increasingly crowded Union Station. By moving farther north than earlier proposed routes, it also would reduce potential conflict with plans for more service along the GO lines. And it would offer an east-west alternative through the downtown.

"We are very happy to finally see some concrete work being done on this proposal," said Louis Mark, a founder of the Toronto Relief Line Alliance, which plans to start ramping up its advocacy. "We have to keep working to make sure as many people as possible know about this proposal, and about its benefits, to make sure it has as much support as possible."

Story continues below advertisement

City planning staff looked at six possible routes. These all started from Broadview or Pape stations and made their way by various routes downtown. The alternative laid out on Friday got top marks in the most categories, including affordability, public health and environment, choice and experience.

One key advantage the route planners say, is that it would create a station by Nathan Phillips Square in "the geographic and psychological centre of the city." This route also has what staff described as the lowest cost of the options, by providing a shorter crossing of the Don River and avoiding pricey soil stabilization required if passing under the river farther to the south.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter