Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
save over 85%
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

In politics as in firefighting, pressure works. Toronto firefighters have scored a big victory over Mayor Rob Ford in their struggle for jobs and resources. On Wednesday morning, city council voted to restore some money to the fire service budget after protests from the firefighters' union. Two motions on the issue passed convincingly. Even Mr. Ford, facing defeat on this fight but determined to get the budget through, voted for the changes.

In the days leading up to the budget vote, the firefighters put on a full display of muscle. Their lobbyists leaned on city councillors to block the mayor's attempt to restrain the $369-million fire department budget. Their union paid for media ads making their case. Their union leader, Ed Kennedy, posed in front of a burned-out home, site of a fatal fire, to condemn "dangerous" budget cuts that he said could compromise public safety.

As councillors debated the issue, dozens of husky firefighters in red T-shirts that said "fewer firefighters, greater risk" filled the public gallery. On Tuesday evening,

Story continues below advertisement

Councillor Paul Ainslie, usually an ally of the the mayor, stood to propose adding $3.1-million to the fire budget, funding 63 threatened firefighting positions at least until the middle of the year. The new funding means that five fire trucks will stay in service.

Mr. Ainslie said fire services carried a "certain emotional impact" - in other words, when fire stations are closed or trucks idled, residents squawk. Budget decisions like these are a mixture of "the political and the financial," he said, and he got an earful at  community meetings where the issue was discussed. He and other councillors argued it was reasonable to put some money back into the fire budget until studies on the efficiency of the fire service come in later this year.

Even Doug Ford, the mayor's brother, called it a triumph for "the art of compromise." It looked more like a surrender. Fire Chief Jim Sales had said he could live with the resources allocated to his service in Mr. Ford's proposed 2013 budget. He denied that there would be any threat to public safety. "What's the sense of having a fire chief if we're going to let the union run the store?" remarked Doug Holyday, the deputy mayor.

Mayor Ford himself said the firefighters' claims were nonsense and accused them of "blowing smoke, pardon the pun." But his executive committee voted last week to add $3-million to the fire budget, adding 15 fire-prevention officers and 20 firefighters. So the vote by council to add another $3.1-million is actually the second retreat in the face of the firefighters' lobby.

"As I look around this room, I'm saddened to think that this council has been muscled by the firefighters' union," said right-leaning councillor Denzil Minnan-Won on Tuesday.

As he noted, "the number of fires have been trending down, the number of people that are dying from fires has also been going down." How, he asked, could city council tell the police and other departments not to hire but say "it's okay to hire 63 more firefighters"?

Good question.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies