Skip to main content

Hazel McCallion knows a good thing when she sees one. The 92-year-old Mississauga mayor has been struggling for years to secure funding for her key transit project: a light-rail line through her suburban boomtown's growing core. Now, at last, there is a chance she might get it.

A long-awaited report from the Metrolinx transit agency proposes raising $2-billion a year by imposing a commercial parking tax, a 5-cent-a-litre gas tax and a 1 percentage point increase in the sales tax. "Metrolinx has done their job," she told reporters. "This plan they've come up with is an excellent plan."

After years of study and delay, it is time to "get on with the job. Get on. Let's go. Let's go. Go!" she said, impatiently. "The time for action has come."

Story continues below advertisement

But will it happen? Is the Metrolinx report really a turning point, or is it destined to join a stack of stillborn transit plans for the Toronto region?

A lot depends on the people of Greater Toronto and the men and women who lead them. Now that Metrolinx has reported, the issue has entered the political realm. Premier Kathleen Wynne says the new transit taxes are necessary to raise the billions needed for transit expansion. But, as leader of a minority government, she is way out on a limb. The opposition parties are either dead against the taxes, in the case of the Tories, or openly skeptical, in the case of the New Democrats.

If the Premier is going to carry the day, she desperately needs the support of the cities. In the case of Mississauga and several other regional municipalities, she clearly has it. Toronto is another question.

In a chaotic meeting earlier this month, city council failed to give a clear thumbs up to a single one of a long list of proposed transit taxes. Instead, councillors fell over themselves to get backing for their pet transit projects. The most they could bring themselves to do was to leave the door open to development charges and a regional sales tax.

TTC chair Karen Stintz insists that it is the job of the Premier, not the city, to choose which taxes to implement. She says that she likes the Metrolinx report, supports its main recommendations (except for the parking tax, which she is against), but feels the provincial government must take the lead, consulting with the public and working to sell commuters on the benefits of the Big Move, the $50-billion Metrolinx transit plan. "Once she comes out with her decision, we need to support her," she says of Ms. Wynne.

Mayor Rob Ford, for his part, says there is no need to consult anyone. To no one's surprise, he thundered against the transit taxes. At a news conference on Tuesday, he said that he supports building rapid transit but: "What I do not support is the province's plan to slap new taxes on the back of hard-working families."

It is all pretty discouraging. Toronto has the most to gain from better transit and the most to lose from rising congestion. This city will be making a huge mistake if it fails to get behind the Metrolinx plan. Many of the projects in the Big Move, such as a new relief line subway looping through downtown and a northward extension of the Yonge subway, have been on the city's wish list for years.

Story continues below advertisement

Although no one likes new taxes, it could have been worse. Metrolinx took the advice of Toronto and other municipalities and did not recommend an increase in local property taxes to pay for transit. Two-thirds of the money would come from the sales tax. The proposed 5-cent gas tax is a third of what Vancouver motorists pay to support transit. The parking levy, 25 cents a day for the average space, would be way lower than similar taxes in Montreal or Sydney, Australia.

Instead of railing against the Metrolinx report or letting the Premier carry the can, Toronto should be leaping to support it. Mississauga sure is. "It's going to take the local politicians and it's going to take the public to tell Queen's Park to get on with the job," Ms. McCallion says. "Get on with the job!"

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter