Skip to main content

City Hall at Nathan Phillips Square

Jim Ross

Toronto is headed for a $167.4-million surplus this year, but the city's new budget chair, Frank Di Giorgio, says he is hoping the final numbers will be higher.

The expected surplus is in part thanks to higher-than-expected revenue from the land-transfer tax and salary savings from unfilled vacancies, says a new staff report to be considered by the budget committee Tuesday.

That same report states that the city ended the first six months of 2013 with a $158.6-million surplus, including an extra $16.8-million from land-transfer taxes.

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Di Giorgio, about to oversee his first round of budget talks, says he would like to end 2013 with more cash than staff are than forecast to cover some looming bills, including new TTC vehicles.

"I am anticipating some pretty high requirements," he said Thursday.

While final numbers are not available, Mr. Di Giorgio said he expects the city will have to find about $250-million in spending cuts to balance the books in 2014. That figure includes a $50-million cut to provincial funding for housing, announced this year, and about $35-million in savings required to fulfill Mayor Rob Ford's goal of cutting the land-transfer tax by 10 per cent.

Mr. Di Giorgio said he is expecting council to push back on the proposed cut.

A new provincial policy, announced this week, to expand the availability of tasers to police forces also is likely to put pressure on the city budget, he said.

The budget update shows the police force has failed to make $6.7-million in spending cuts. It forecasts that police will finish the year with a $2.1-million budget deficit.

The TTC also is expected to finish the year $1.1-million in the red because of increased demand for its Wheel-Trans services.

Story continues below advertisement

Editor's Note: The surplus numbers for the City of Toronto stated in this article are gross, not net, numbers.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies