Skip to main content

An Ontario Superior Court judge has dismissed the City of Toronto’s attempt to shut down the ride-sharing company Uber.

Kai Pfaffenbach/Reuters

An Ontario Superior Court judge has dismissed the City of Toronto's attempt to shut down ride-sharing company Uber.

After a month of deliberating, Justice Sean Dunphy delivered his ruling Friday, saying the city failed to prove that Uber has broken any bylaws or that it is operating an illegal taxicab company.

The decision strikes a blow to Toronto city officials and the taxicab industry and is likely to reverberate across Canada as cities struggle to regulate the ride-sharing service.

Story continues below advertisement

The company's UberX mobile app, which was the subject of the city's legal action, allows ordinary drivers to use their private vehicles to pick up paid fares. While the city argued in its case that this constituted an illegal taxi service, Justice Dunphy instead questioned whether the rules themselves have been sufficiently crafted. He took specific aim at the city's narrow definition of "taxicab service" and the fact that a taxi broker is defined only as a person who "accepts" requests for transportation – and not necessarily a person who arranges it.

"Have the city's regulations, crafted in a different era, with different technology in mind, created a flexible regulatory firewall around the taxi industry sufficient to resist the Uber challenge," he wrote in his decision, "or have they instead created the equivalent of a regulatory Maginot Line behind which it has retreated, neither confronting nor embracing the challenges of the new world of Internet-enabled mobile communications?"

In a statement, Uber Toronto's general manager Ian Black said he is pleased with the ruling.

"Our hope is that this decision helps further pave the way for ride-sharing regulations and we look forward to continuing our work with Mayor [John] Tory and Toronto City Council."

Already, Mr. Tory has said publicly that he supports creating new regulations to account for Uber-like technologies. Friday evening, his office issued a statement saying he intends to have the taxi industry and Uber meet with him together to come to a "mutually agreeable solution."

But he is likely to face strong opposition from at least a few members of council, as well as from the vocal taxi industry.

Earlier this week, a group of taxi-industry representatives gathered at City Hall to demand the mayor and police crack down on Uber, and threatened to stage a strike during the Pan Am Games if their demands are not met.

Story continues below advertisement

A spokeswoman for the city's licensing division said that officials are still reviewing the decision and will provide further comment next week.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter