Skip to main content
Welcome to
super saver spring
offer ends april 20
save over $140
Sale ends in
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
Welcome to
super saver spring
$0.99
per week for 24 weeks
save over $140
// //

Thika, one of the Toronto Zoo's three remaining elephants, walks around it's enclosure.

PAT HEWITT/THE CANADIAN PRESS

The Toronto Zoo is not foot-dragging on a Council-imposed move of three aged elephants, staff made clear Monday morning, but they still can't offer specifics on when or how the beloved pachyderms will be California-bound.

Zoo staff provided an update on the elephants' status Tuesday morning, responding to mounting pressure from city councillors and zoo critics pressing to have the Toka, Thika and Iringa shipped to a California sanctuary before winter sets in.

That timeline now looks unlikely. Zoo CEO John Tracogna told reporters that, contrary to recent reports, the zoo was not impeding the move and had met an application deadline for a federal export permit. But Canadian and U.S. approvals could still take upwards of three months.

Story continues below advertisement

Organizations such as Zoochek Canada have argued that the animals could be trained for the 3500-kilometre journey within a few weeks. Zoo staff accompanying Mr. Tracogna countered that the training process would take much longer.

"I think the elephants are going to let us know," said elephant keeper Chris Dulong, the Zoo's African Savannah supervisor.

Mr. Tracogna also attempted to dispel notions that the Zoo is not cooperating with the Performing Animal Welfare Society, the California group set to take ownership of the animals.

"I've had an excellent rapport with [PAWS founder]d Stewart," Mr. Tracogna said, adding that the zoo is sending a team to PAWS on Sunday to examine the California facility and share health information with local staff.

It remains unclear how the animals will be moved. PAWS staff first need to source three elephantine crates and ship them to trainers in Toronto. Then Zoocheck Canada, the organization funding the entire move, must decide whether a $100,000 truck trip or a $300,000 plane ride makes more sense.

"There are challenges to both," said Zoocheck campaigns director Julie Woodyer.

The California move, imposed by City Council in October, goes against advice from staff as well as a prior decision from the city's own Zoo Board, who raised concerns over PAWS' lack of certification.

Story continues below advertisement

In recent weeks, zoo staff have taken to Facebook to criticize the move, writing disparaging comments about the city councillors involved. Mr. Tracogna said the online outbursts have prompted a review of the social media policies.

"As you all know this has been an emotionally charged issue for a number of months," he said. "We regret that some employees have posted some inappropriate remarks on personal Facebook pages."

The Zoo will offer a further update when its team returns from California on Dec. 22.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies