Skip to main content
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
Canada’s most-awarded newsroom for a reason
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Tearing down the Gardiner east of Jarvis would add space for condos and other buildings, but could lengthen some commutes by as much as 30 minutes.

Waterfront Toronto has thrown its support behind removing the Gardiner East, saying that taking down the elevated expressway would cause "significant" delays on barely 1 per cent of trips in the city.

The board of the government agency, which oversees waterfront projects, said in a statement on Friday that removing the aging expressway "best supports and enhances the revitalization of the Toronto waterfront." The city is proposing to replace the stretch with an expanded surface route.

Although all options for the Gardiner would be pricey, the $240-million estimated cost of removing it is the cheapest. The other possibilities are rebuilding it (the most expensive, at $700-million), improving it and maintaining it.

Story continues below advertisement

"The capacity … of that Lake Shore/Gardiner twin that we've got right now in that eastern section is more than is needed," Mark Wilson, chairman of the agency, said on Friday. "Something has to be done. It's going to be significantly disruptive, regardless. It's going to cost several hundred million dollars. What's the best return to the city?"

A city report this month showed that the eastern Gardiner is relatively lightly used. About 4,500 vehicles per hour head west during the peak morning rush, with another 1,200 heading east. According to Waterfront Toronto, switching to a widened road at street level would mean delays of more than seven minutes, which it termed "significant," for 17,500 trips per day. For comparison, they noted that about 1.6 million trips are made daily in Toronto, using all transportation types.

Councillor Denzil Minnan-Wong, who is mulling a run for mayor, has spoken against removing the Gardiner East. On Friday, he questioned Waterfront Toronto's assumptions, noting that the economic costs of congestion are not included in the debate and that the Gardiner is not the only barrier between the city and the lake.

"I've always seen their position as biased," he said. "They've always wanted it removed."

The Waterfront Toronto board is made up of business people, current and former politicians, academic leaders and environmentalists. Its position is not terribly surprising – the agency had a hand in a city report earlier this month leaning toward removal – but it does raise the pressure on the issue.

With an election coming, the Gardiner debate is already a political football. It dovetails with the "war on the car" rhetoric that helped Rob Ford get elected as mayor, and he has spoken strongly against removing any part of the highway. Mr. Wilson acknowledged that the fate of the highway is being decided at an awkward time. But he said there is little option.

"The Gardiner's going to fall down if we don't do something," he said. "… Although it may have been politically safer to wait, public safety is really at risk if we don't move. And we need to get moving and I think another year's delay is really not prudent."

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies