Skip to main content
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track on the Olympic Games
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Complete Olympic Games coverage at your fingertips
Your inside track onthe Olympics Games
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

UN peacekeeping soldiers from Rwanda patrol in Bangui, Central African Republic, in this 2014 file photo.

PACOME PABANDJI/AFP / Getty Images

The United Nations is rejecting growing pressure to name countries whose peacekeepers face sexual abuse accusations in Central African Republic against children as young as 11, keeping silent because member states have delayed the U.N. chief's plan to identify alleged perpetrators.

The U.N. General Assembly in June adopted a resolution that in part singled out Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon's intention to name countries when sexual abuse allegations are credible. The resolution asked Ban to "engage in consultations with member states, in particular troop-contributing countries" over reporting such cases.

Peacekeepers in Central African Republic have been hit by more than a dozen allegations of sexual abuse, and Ban last week took the unprecedented step of firing the mission's leader, saying "enough is enough." The issue has haunted the world body for years.

Story continues below advertisement

Ban also repeated his intention to start naming countries. But a spokeswoman for him this week said the initiative needs the 193-member General Assembly's approval.

Of the 13 sexual abuse allegations received since peacekeepers started arriving in Central African Republic nearly a year ago to calm sectarian violence, "nine involve alleged attacks on minors," the mission's deputy head, Diane Corner, said Thursday.

No one has been convicted, she said.

The latest accusations, announced Wednesday, were brought by the families of three young females, including one minor, against three members of Congo's military. Half of that country's troops, and all of its police officers, are now expected to leave the mission by October instead of December.

The U.N. has been urged to name names. In June, a high-level panel led by Nobel Peace Prize laureate Jose Ramos-Horta recommended a major overhaul of peacekeeping operations that would include naming countries whose troops commit acts of sexual abuse.

Countries have the sole responsibility to prosecute their troops, but the U.N.'s internal oversight office this summer reported that many countries don't even tell the U.N. whether they intend to investigate alleged sexual misconduct.

The U.N. relies on member states to contribute troops and police to put peacekeepers in some of the world's most vulnerable areas. Most of the top troop contributors are largely developing countries from Africa and South Asia, who are paid a little over $1,000 per person per month in return.

Story continues below advertisement

Angering the countries by naming them in sexual misconduct cases could shrink an already stretched pool of available troops and police.

Congo's military, which has nearly 900 personnel in Central African Republic, has been called out by the U.N. in the past for conflict-related sexual violence, including against children.

Dragica Mikavica, advocacy officer for the New York-based Watchlist on Children and Armed Conflict, told The Associated Press that when the group asked why Congo was allowed to send peacekeepers when it serves in no other U.N. mission, the peacekeeping office replied, "They have the troops."

In April, the now-fired peacekeeping mission chief, Babacar Gaye, addressed the group's concerns during a talk at the International Peace Institute, saying of Congo's troops: "You may be disappointed, but they are behaving."

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies