Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Cancel Anytime
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
Just $1.99per week for the first 24weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Omar Khadr, photographed in 2009.

Sitting in court, heavy brows furrowed, fists propped under bearded chin and black sneakers looking out of place with loose white prison garb, he looks like a profoundly fed-up twentysomething.

But in a letter to his Canadian lawyer earlier this year, the scrawled handwriting and syncopated cadence read like those of a much younger, conflicted individual: "Sometimes there are things you can't say, but rather write on paper, and even if i were to tell you you won't understand," it opens. "So anyway here are the things."

"It seems that we've done everything," he adds later in the letter released recently by the lawyer, "but the world doesn't get it. … I really don't want to live in a life like this."

Story continues below advertisement

"I hate being the head of the speer, Dennis."

That life - years of legal wrangling over his fate, mired in Guantanamo Bay's military-commissions system - is nearing some form of resolution.

In a heavily air-conditioned Guantanamo courtroom, a coterie of U.S. military personnel - judge, jury, defence and prosecution - are expected to convene the long-delayed military-commission trial that will decide Omar Khadr's fate.

View or download the letter below, or read a transcript here .

<a title="View Omar Khadr to Dennis Edney, May 26, 2010 on Scribd" href="" style="margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block; text-decoration: underline;">Omar Khadr to Dennis Edney, May 26, 2010</a> <object id="doc_727102445862744" name="doc_727102445862744" height="600" width="600" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="" style="outline:none;" > <param name="movie" value=""> <param name="wmode" value="opaque"> <param name="bgcolor" value="#ffffff"> <param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> <param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"> <param name="FlashVars" value="document_id=35567653&access_key=key-2d7h635e2dbegjkeqtgy&page=1&viewMode=list"> <embed id="doc_727102445862744" name="doc_727102445862744" src="" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="600" width="600" wmode="opaque" bgcolor="#ffffff"></embed> </object>

In U.S. custody since he was taken captive in 2002 after a firefight in Afghanistan at age 15, Mr. Khadr is charged with murder, attempted murder, spying, conspiracy and supporting terrorism. He has been characterized variously as a child soldier and teen killer; a terrorist and torture victim; the scion of Canada's notorious al-Qaeda member and a Canadian citizen abandoned.

He has prompted debates about the rights - or limitations - of Canadian citizenship and motivated Ottawa to fight rulings that would oblige the government to go to bat for citizens detained abroad.

Prosecutors have accused his defence lawyers of attempting to derail or delay a trial as late as last week, when his military-appointed lawyer unsuccessfully petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court to halt proceedings.

Story continues below advertisement

Now it all comes down to the next several weeks.

This trial will be a litmus test for U.S. President Barack Obama's revamped military-commissions process and his handling of Guantanamo Bay, the notorious detention centre the President vowed to close by a deadline that passed eight months ago.

Can the trial go forward? More crucially, can it go forward with enough transparency and legitimacy to pave the way for the far more high-stakes trials of 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and other high-level terrorism suspects?

"I'm sure this wasn't anybody's choice to have this one go first," says Thomas Joscelyn, a terrorism analyst and senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies.

But the United States, he says, would have a hard time simply releasing him given what he's charged with and who his family is: His father was a prominent al-Qaeda financier; his oldest brother, Abdullah Khadr, was just released from prison after 4 1/2 years on terrorism charges.

"The Obama military-commissions test case will be the prosecution of a child," Mr. Khadr's military lawyer, Lieutenant-Colonel Jon Jackson, said. "That's a fact."

Story continues below advertisement

For Mr. Khadr's family, it means more questions, more people asking prying questions over the phone or at their Scarborough home.

"Every time there is an article about Omar, about our family, someone comes to our door," his sister, Zaynab Khadr, said.

"I have too much to say. [But]why would I speak to anybody? Why should I trust anyone?"

Conviction seems almost inevitable in a process "designed to make findings of guilt," his Edmonton-based lawyers Nathan Whitling and Dennis Edney have said.

His best shot is the suppression motion that will be completed this week, the last thing to wrap up before the trial itself gets under way.

If military judge Colonel Patrick Parrish agrees with defence arguments that much of the evidence against Mr. Khadr - specifically his own confessions - was obtained through torture and coercion and shouldn't be admitted in the trial, it weakens the prosecution's case.

Story continues below advertisement

Lieutenant-Colonel David Frakt, a veteran of Guantanamo's military-commissions process, succeeded in doing just that. He got charges dropped against his client, Mohamed Jawad, an Afghan accused of lobbing a grenade at passing U.S. soldiers as a teenager, because Mr. Jawad's confessions were deemed inadmissible.

Despite Mr. Khadr's own pessimism, Col. Frakt argues he "has a very good shot at beating the murder rap." Other charges, including supporting terrorism, may be harder to dodge.

But much comes down to the way the jury panel interprets the case.

"Most of the jurors will have teenaged children," Col. Frakt says. "And it's going to be hard for them to not think about how they would want their son to be treated in such a situation."

A jury of officers

The bad news: You got tagged for jury duty. The worse news: It's jury duty in Guantanamo Bay.

The military-commissions process allows for trial by jury - but in a dramatically different format than the civilian jury system.

Story continues below advertisement

A panel of 14 American military officers - all adult U.S. citizens based around the world - has been selected to attend Omar Khadr's military-commissions trial in anticipation of a start date this week. Both the defence and prosecution have the opportunity to challenge anyone they find problematic; the minimum number of jury members is five.

The selection process is the diametric opposite of the purposely random jury selection of Canadian and U.S. civilian courts: These Defence Department officers are recommended by their superiors in the army, navy, air force and marine corps. They're then meticulously vetted by those organizing the military commission.

"You want a jury of your peers, so you want people in your command, as a soldier, judging you," Mr. Khadr's military lawyer, Lieutenant-Colonel Jon Jackson, said.

He added wryly, "I don't think that logic applies to detainees."

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies