Skip to main content

The anti-graft mission is a cornerstone of President Xi Jinping’s rule.

Lintao Zhang/Getty Images

As part of China's anti-corruption drive, its authorities have actively pursued alleged white-collar criminals far beyond its borders – and the response has not always been welcome.

Last summer, the Obama administration sent a stern warning to the Chinese government to stop covert activity on American soil.

Chinese secret agents are reportedly entering the United States on tourist and trade visas and then proceeding to pressure expatriates to return to China and face charges, according to The New York Times.

Story continues below advertisement

Related: Chinese agents enter Canada on tourist visas to coerce return of fugitive expats

Related: Seven things to know about China's overseas anti-corruption campaign

Without extradition agreements with the United States, Canada and New Zealand – top destinations for fleeing Chinese economic fugitives – a zealous Chinese government keen to show its public that is cracking down on corruption is taking an aggressive approach.

Diplomatic dust-ups have also taken place between China and Australia over the presence of Chinese secret agents. A 2007 extradition treaty has yet to be ratified by Australia.

The anti-graft mission is a cornerstone of President Xi Jinping's rule. In 2013, he vowed to hunt down what he called "tigers" and "flies" – a vow to go after the country's most powerful leadership and its most minor bureaucrats.

Operation Fox Hunt, launched in 2014, saw the return of 700 suspected economic fugitives, and Operation Skynet, the renamed global operation in 2015, netted 857, according to China's public-security ministry.

The names, photos and charges against the 100 most-wanted were published in Chinese newspapers last year.

Story continues below advertisement

They include bankers, local development officials and employees of state-run companies accused of engaging in fraud, bribery and embezzlement. Authorities in China believe that about a quarter of those individuals are in Canada.

How exactly China persuades alleged fugitives to return home is not entirely clear.

In 2014, a Shanghai publication offered clues about how agents with Operation Fox Hunt work. One police officer explained that repeated phone conversations with suspects did little to persuade them to return to China. Instead, a 20-minute face-to-face chat did the trick.

"My experience is that the effect of face-to-face persuasion and persuasion by telephone is totally different," Li Gongjing told Xinmin Weekly, according to Time Magazine.

The allegation by Western officials is that Chinese agents routinely use strong-arm tactics on foreign soil when dealing with expatriates.

China has bristled at criticism over its global campaign and argued that Western countries have been offering safe haven to individuals guilty of economic crimes.

Story continues below advertisement

By pursuing extradition agreements with Western countries, China is looking to increase international co-operation on the return of alleged economic fugitives.

But there are significant concerns among human-rights groups over scant evidence of crimes and lack of due process in the Chinese justice system. There are also concerns that the courts could be used to settle political scores. An even greater worry is the use of torture and the death penalty.

With reports from wire services and Nathan VanderKlippe

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter