Skip to main content

World Guantanamo prisoners tuned in for Obama-Romney debate

The sun rises over the U.S. detention center at U.S. Naval Base Guantanamo Bay October 18, 2012 in this photo reviewed by the U.S. Department of Defense.

Michelle Shephard/Pool photo via REUTERS

A few dozen Guantanamo prisoners were among the millions who tuned in for the U.S. presidential debate on Monday night.

Two cellblocks watched on television as President Barack Obama and his Republican challenger Mitt Romney squared off in Boca Raton, Florida. Another cellblock followed a radio broadcast, a military spokeswoman said.

Detainees who follow camp rules are allowed to live in communal cellblocks and have access to satellite television.

Story continues below advertisement

There was no word on who they rooted for, but they would have been disappointed if they were hoping to hear about their own situation.

Although the debate's focus was foreign policy, there was no mention of Obama's failed promise to shut down the detention camp at the U.S. Naval base in eastern Cuba, which still holds 166 captives and is seen as fuelling anti-U.S. sentiment around the world.

The facility's future is a touchy subject for Obama, who made a campaign promise to shut it down when he won the White House in 2008.

Civil liberties advocates say the indefinite detentions at the base are illegal or unjustified.

Obama's administration said when it first took office in 2009 that it planned to close the prison, and bring some of the most notorious militants held there, including alleged Sept. 11 conspirators, to trial in civilian courts.

But the plan sparked a political uproar and Congress approved legislation banning the transfer of Guantanamo detainees to the United States for trial, or any other reason.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter