Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

About sixty people, thirty representing both sides of the issue, protested peacefully outside of the Federal courthouse on Queen Street west in Toronto on Monday morning prior to a court challenge to the decision to not allow George Galloway to enter Canada. The hearing was adjourned until Wednesday.

From the time of its formation in the Middle East a generation ago, Hamas has drawn considerable moral support - and, allegedly, financial support - from constituencies in Canada.

"I don't think they have a presence here, but they have many people sympathizing," says Aly Hindy, an Egyptian-born imam who preaches in Toronto. Many Muslims, he said, regard Hamas as a force for social good.

The government sees things differently. Ottawa officials declared Hamas a banned terrorist organization a decade ago. And yet, precisely what constitutes illegal support for Hamas remains a vexing question for federal authorities.

Story continues below advertisement

In 2006, the new Conservative government announced that Canada would be the first state to suspend aid to the then-newly elected Hamas government. Later, the Conservatives blocked British MP George Galloway from entering Canada, saying he had violated terrorism laws by being an outspoken Hamas supporter. (Judges overturned the measure and allowed Mr. Galloway to enter.) One U.S. law-enforcement official told The Globe that Hamas's footprint in Canada goes back to when the group formed in the late 1980s. That was when a Toronto mailing address was used to handle correspondence for a North American propaganda magazine.

That's consistent with a larger trend.

Most terrorist activity in Canada tends to be limited to "propaganda, financial, and/or support cells - most recently financial-support fronts for Hamas," U.S. diplomats posted to Ottawa wrote in a 2004 State Department cable, which has recently surfaced on WikiLeaks, but does not name names.

Authorities have zeroed in on certain charities as potential problems.

In 1993, the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation secretly monitored a meeting of mostly Arab men in a Philadelphia hotel. The FBI came to harbour suspicions that the purpose of the meeting was to set up a vast network to funnel money to Hamas.

One attendee of the meeting, Canada's Rasem Abdelmajid, went on to work as a general manager for a Mississauga-based charity known as IRFAN-Canada. After years of legal battles, federal tax regulators this spring blocked IRFAN from issuing tax receipts. The Canada Revenue Agency alleges the charity had moved funds to overseas organizations that it alleges are linked to Hamas.

IRFAN is appealing the case. It continues to raise funds as a not-for-profit agency and has never faced criminal allegations.

Story continues below advertisement

"What we are doing is 100-per-cent humanitarian projects, building some schools, helping some students, health education and so on," Mr. Abdelmajid told an interviewer during a recent Islamic conference in Toronto.

There are few documented cases of anyone in Canada lending direct support to violent Hamas militants, although one Gaza-born Canadian citizen has pleaded guilty to being such an operative.

In 2004, Jamal Akkal, then 24, confessed to raising funds for Hamas and scoping out targets for attacks in Canada. Though he pleaded guilty in an Israeli military court, he later recanted his confessions. He returned to Canada after serving a four-year jail sentence.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Comments are closed

We have closed comments on this story for legal reasons or for abuse. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies