Skip to main content

From left, Turkish Foreign Minister Feridun Sinirlioglu, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry, Saudi Arabia's Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir and Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov meet in Vienna on the Syrian conflict.

CARLO ALLEGRI/AFP/Getty Images

The United States, Russia, Saudi Arabia and Turkey put forward new ideas Friday to revive a failed push for a political transition in Syria that could end the country's civil war, U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry said Friday. But they remained deeply divided over the future of Syrian President Bashar Assad.

The top diplomats from the four countries agreed to meet again in an expanded format with representatives from other nations next week, but the only concrete result of this week's talks appeared to be an agreement between Jordan and Russia to co-ordinate military operations in Syria. Kerry said there was no decision on whether to invite Iran, a major patron of Syria.

Kerry said that he, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov, Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir and Turkish Foreign Minister Feridun Sinirlioglu went over proposals to restart moribund talks on how to create a transitional government for Syria. Kerry gave no details.

Story continues below advertisement

"I am convinced, having been part of this process since the day I became secretary that today's meeting was constructive and productive and succeeded in surfacing some ideas, which I am not going to share today, but which I hope have a possibility of changing the dynamic," Kerry told reporters after the meeting.

Lavrov said he has invited the U.S., Saudi Arabia and Turkey to join the co-ordinationcentre that Russia and Jordan agreed earlier Friday that they would set up to integrate their air campaigns over Syria. Jordan is a member of the U.S.-led coalition that is bombing Islamic State facilities in Iraq and Syria. The coalition has so far refused to co-operate with Russia's operations beyond a basic agreement intended to prevent mid-air incidents. Mohammad al-Momani, Jordanian government spokesman said the agreement did not mean that Jordan was leaving the coalition.

Kerry, travelling to Jordan later Friday for talks with King Abdullah II and Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas, said the new ideas "are in keeping with all of the principles that have been laid down and with sensitivities of the nations and the parties, the opposition, all those involved in this effort."

A leading Syrian opposition group, the Syrian National Council, was unconvinced.

"We will not accept the presence of Assad for one day in the transitional period," said Anas al-Abdah, a member of the coalition, said in a statement emailed to AP.

Kerry said the countries' representatives would meet again as early as next Friday to determine whether there is enough reason to proceed.

The U.S., Turkey and Saudi Arabia all share the view that Syrian President Bashar Assad must go if the conflict is to be resolved. Russia, however, is Assad's prime backer, along with Iran. Russia began airstrikes in Syria last month that it said were aimed at Islamic State militants, but the U.S. and its allies say the bombing is bolstering Assad rather than targeting militants.

Story continues below advertisement

Kerry said that despite Russian and Iranian support for Assad, the U.S. and allied nations "understand that Assad creates an impossible dynamic for peace." That situation, Kerry said, "has to be resolved," suggesting political talks could patch up the differences.

Lavrov said Russia's support for Assad remains strong despite what he described as "rumours" that the current talks were aimed at eventually easing the Syrian president from power.

"Our partners have some obsession with the figure of the Syrian president, but we reaffirmed our position," Lavrov said. He pointed to Russian President Vladimir Putin's warning during recent talks with Assad in Moscow that a narrow focus "on a concrete figure" during the height of the continuing conflict could lead to a "grave crisis."

One item on the agenda, Kerry said, was which nations should be included political transition discussions. Russia is keen to bring Iran into the talks, but Saudi Arabia is opposed. The Obama administration has said repeatedly that all the countries with an interest in Syria, including Iran and Russia, need to agree on what the transition should bring: a unified, secular and pluralistic Syria governed with the consent of its people.

Assad, the administration, says is the only thing standing in the way.

Syria is in its fifth year of a civil war that has killed hundreds of thousands, spurred a massive refugee crisis in Europe and led to the emergence of the Islamic State group and Russia's direct military intervention.

Story continues below advertisement

Friday's meetings in Vienna — site of the world's last major international diplomatic success, the Iran nuclear deal in July — followed a surprise visit by Assad on Tuesday to Moscow. There, he and Putin discussed Russia's military operations in Syria that the U.S. and others say are bolstering Assad and not targeting Islamic State militants, as Russia claims.

Putin said Thursday that Assad had told him he is ready to talk with his political foes. Putin also defended Russia's bombing campaign, saying it would set the stage for peace talks.

A military victory over the militants "will not solve all problems, but it will create conditions for the main thing: a beginning of a political process to encompass all healthy, patriotic forces of the Syrian society," Putin said. His words echoed those of Syrian government officials who have expressed readiness to negotiate with the "patriotic" opposition — a term generally used to describe unarmed, mostly Damascus-based government critics who are tolerated by Assad.

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies