Skip to main content

Sen. Mike Duffy, a former Conservative caucus member, leaves a courthouse in Ottawa on Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2015.

Justin Tang/THE CANADIAN PRESS

Sen. Mike Duffy is going to find his Senate paycheque will soon be a little lighter.

The Senate is going to start clawing back Duffy's salary after the Prince Edward Island senator refused to repay almost $17,000 in disputed expense claims before Saturday's deadline.

Duffy also opted against having an outside arbitrator hear arguments in the case.

Story continues below advertisement

A spokeswoman for Sen. Leo Housakos, chairman of the upper chamber's internal economy committee, says the Senate must now garnishee Duffy's salary under the dispute resolution policy set up in response to the auditor general's audit.

Jacqui Delaney says the details of how much will be clawed back, and for how long, are still being worked out.

The Senate previously withheld a percentage of Sen. Patrick Brazeau's salary until the upper chamber recouped about $49,000 in disputed housing expenses.

Duffy was not immediately available for comment Monday.

The Senate decided last month that it wanted the money back after taking a second look at seven claims totalling $16,995. Senate officials said the action came about because of new information that "had surfaced in the public domain" during Duffy's criminal trial.

The claims range from $10,000 for a personal trainer to $8 for personal photos.

Duffy's lawyer told the Senate that the one-time Conservative senator's spending was given the all-clear by an Ontario Court judge earlier this year when Duffy was acquitted of 31 criminal charges.

Story continues below advertisement

Lawyer Donald Bayne also said Duffy didn't want to take part in the arbitration process because he does not want to "legitimize" a process that is "an improper collateral attack" on the judge's verdict.

From the archives:

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter
To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies