Skip to main content

The Globe and Mail

UN investigation implicates Rwanda in backing rebels

A Congolese man who lost his legs during 2008 fighting between government soldiers and a former rebel group sits with his prosthetic legs on the ground near Goma's football stadium. Congo. Thousands of Congolese soldiers and policemen defected to the M23 rebels Wednesday, as rebel leaders vowed to take control of all Congo, including the capital Kinshasa.

Marc Hofer/AP

The satellite photos were damning. In the dense forest, under the shadow of a volcano, a well-trodden trail can be clearly seen from the sky, leading directly from a Rwandan military base across the border to a headquarters of Congo's M23 rebel militia.

The 15-kilometre trail, up to four metres wide, was used to transport military supplies and recruits from the Rwandan military to the rebels who dramatically captured the key city of Goma in eastern Congo this week, United Nations investigators say.

The satellite images are among dozens of pieces of evidence gathered by UN investigators revealing how Rwanda violated an arms embargo to give direct help to the M23 rebel militia in the Democratic Republic of Congo, allowing the rebels to seize a huge swath of the mineral-rich region and severely weaken Congo's national government, which the rebels have vowed to topple.

Story continues below advertisement

"There are no economic or migratory activities which would otherwise explain the existence of such trails," a team of UN experts noted dryly in a report on their investigation.

"If they are not frequently used, the dense forest would cover these trails in a little over a month," it noted.

Rwanda's crucial support for the M23 rebels is the latest chapter in a long and bloody history between Rwanda and Congo. Since the late 1990s, its tough and battle-hardened military has played a key role in supporting a series of Congolese rebel groups, allowing it to gain strong influence and economic power in the eastern regions of one of Africa's biggest and most war-torn countries.

Its aid to the rebels, ranging from troop reinforcements and weapon supplies to financial and logistical support, is pivotal in explaining the stunning advances of the M23 rebel group in recent months.

The rebels, with an estimated 3,000 fighters in their ranks, are far from a typical ragtag militia. Wearing crisp, new camouflage uniforms, and armed with sophisticated equipment such as night-vision gear and 120-millimetre mortars, the rebels swept into Goma this week, overwhelming the city's defences, humiliating the Congolese army and pushing aside the UN peacekeeping force in the strategic city.

The rebels are now surging southward, toward Bukavu, another strategic city and the capital of South Kivu province. On Thursday, they were advancing steadily on a road to the south, forcing Congo's army into retreat. By capturing Bukavu and Goma, the rebels would be in a strong position to dominate most of eastern Congo.

Rwanda has denied the UN allegations. But there is a growing international consensus that the conclusions of the UN investigators are correct. In a key breakthrough on the issue, the British government announced on Thursday that it accepted the accuracy of the UN report and it threatened to cut off future aid to Rwanda as a result.

Story continues below advertisement

"We judge the overall body of evidence of Rwandan involvement with M23 in the DRC to be credible and compelling," said a statement by British Foreign Secretary William Hague.

"We will be studying the implications of this report in full, but these allegations will necessarily be a key factor in future aid decisions to the government of Rwanda."

The 204-page report of the UN investigators was presented on Wednesday to the UN Security Council, which is wrestling with how to respond to the rebel capture of Goma. The United States, a close ally of the Rwandan government, has vetoed any attempt to name Rwanda specifically as the key supporter of the rebels, but that stand might now be changing, according to some reports.

The UN investigators also found evidence that the rebels had received military help from Uganda, which – like Rwanda – has a history of interfering in eastern Congo. But the biggest assistance to the rebels has come from Rwanda, the report said. It said the rebels are unofficially under the command of Rwanda's Defence Minister, General James Kabarebe, along with an indicted war-crimes fugitive, General Bosco Ntaganda – known as "The Terminator."

The evidence cited in the UN report is detailed and exhaustive. It includes radio intercepts of communications between Rwandan and rebel commanders, scores of interviews with former M23 rebel fighters (including 26 Rwandans), photos of grenades used in Goma that are routinely used in the Rwandan army but not used by Congo's army, and captured Rwandan identity documents from Rwandans who were conducting intelligence operations with the rebels in Congo.

"Rwandan officials have provided military support to M23 through permanent troop reinforcements and clandestine support through special forces units," the report said.

Story continues below advertisement

The investigators also found that M23 rebels have been recruited in Rwandan villages, while former members of other militias have joined the rebellion by travelling through Rwandan territory, and funds for the rebels have been collected by members of Rwanda's ruling party.

"Officers of the Rwandan armed forces have also furnished the rebels with weapons, facilitated the evacuation of casualties to Rwanda and shared communication equipment with M23," the report said.

Report an error Licensing Options
About the Author
Africa Bureau Chief

Geoffrey York is The Globe and Mail's Africa correspondent.He has been a foreign correspondent for the newspaper since 1994, including seven years as the Moscow Bureau Chief and seven years as the Beijing Bureau Chief.He is a veteran war correspondent who has covered war zones since 1992 in places such as Somalia, Sudan, Chechnya, Iraq and Afghanistan. More


The Globe invites you to share your views. Please stay on topic and be respectful to everyone. For more information on our commenting policies and how our community-based moderation works, please read our Community Guidelines and our Terms and Conditions.

Please note that our commenting partner Civil Comments is closing down. As such we will be implementing a new commenting partner in the coming weeks. As of December 20th, 2017 we will be shutting down commenting on all article pages across our site while we do the maintenance and updates. We understand that commenting is important to our audience and hope to have a technical solution in place January 2018.

Discussion loading… ✨