Skip to main content
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week for 24 weeks
Access every election story that matters
Enjoy unlimited digital access
$1.99
per week
for 24 weeks
// //

Canada is second only to the United States when it comes to prosecuting people who infect others with HIV, a surprising new study reveals.

More than 600 people worldwide have been convicted of a crime after infecting a sexual partner with the AIDS virus, or because they potentially exposed others to the virus through spitting, biting, blood transfusion, oral sex or intercourse, according to data compiled by the Global Network of People Living with HIV.

Moono Nyambe, a program officer with the group, known as GNP+, said there have been criminal convictions related to the transmission of HIV in at least 50 countries since 2005.

Story continues below advertisement

Some 45 countries now have laws that specifically criminalize transmission of HIV, she said, while other countries use existing laws.

Prosecutions are becoming increasingly frequent and there is a marked escalation in the severity of charges and the punishment meted out, Ms. Nyambe said.

Richard Elliott, executive director of the Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network, said Canada is a case in point.

There have been 63 criminal convictions related to HIV-AIDS transmission in Canada. The charges include common nuisance, sexual assault and murder.

Mr. Elliott could point to no obvious reason why Canada has a high number of prosecutions, except that it is a country with a strong tradition of the rule of law. "When you have a political system with a lot of state regulation, that can be both positive and negative," he said.

The first case of HIV transmission to be prosecuted in Canada occurred in 1998, when Henry Cuerrier of Squamish, B.C., was charged with aggravated assault for not telling two sexual partners he was infected with HIV. He was acquitted because neither woman became infected.

Last year, Johnson Aziga of Hamilton, Ont., was convicted of two counts of first-degree murder after he infected two sexual partners with HIV. Both women died of AIDS-related cancers.

Story continues below advertisement

The issue of criminal prosecution of those who transmit HIV-AIDS is complex, Mr. Elliott said. "This is not a black-and-white issue. It's all shades of grey."

The big problem in Canada is that prosecutions are arbitrary, and hence unfair, Mr. Elliott contends. For example, he said, charges have been laid against HIV-positive prisoners for spitting on correctional officers, as well as in cases of unprotected sex where no infection occurs, actions that in the ordinary course of events often have no legal consequences.

The Canadian HIV/AIDS Legal Network is working with provincial justice officials to develop guidelines for prosecution.

According to the GNP+ report, the United States has the largest number of convictions related to exposure to HIV, at 205. The country is notable for prosecuting cases in which transmission of the virus is essentially nil, such as when an HIV-infected person spits on someone.

Ms. Nyambe said it is ironic that the vast majority of prosecutions for HIV transmission are in North America and Europe, which have a relatively low rate of infection. But she said there is a growing trend for countries in Africa and Asia - where the epidemic is widespread - to criminalize transmission of the virus.

Susan Timberlake, senior law and human-rights adviser with UNAIDS, said the organization has made it a priority to ensure the removal of "punitive laws, policies, practices, stigma and discrimination that block effective responses to HIV."

Story continues below advertisement

Part of that battle, she said, is ensuring that prosecutions for HIV transmission are appropriate. According to UNAIDS, criminal charges are justified only when a person intentionally seeks to infect another with HIV-AIDS.

Ms. Timberlake noted that there are two divergent philosophies on criminal prosecution. One holds that tough laws will discourage irresponsible acts; the other that the fear of prosecution will lead those who are HIV-positive to avoid being tested and to hide their status.

Mr. Elliott said the reality is that there is no good evidence to back either view.

"We're operating in an evidentiary vacuum," he said. "But regardless of positions, there is a consensus that we need to bring some rationality to the use of criminal law."





The main tenets of the Vienna Declaration

We, the undersigned, call on governments and international organizations, including the United Nations, to:

Story continues below advertisement

* Undertake a transparent review of the effectiveness of current drug policies.

* Implement and evaluate a science-based public health approach to address the individual and community harms stemming from illicit drug use.

* Decriminalize drug users, scale up evidence-based drug dependence treatment options and abolish ineffective compulsory drug treatment centres that violate the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.26

* Unequivocally endorse and scale up funding for the implementation of the comprehensive package of HIV interventions spelled out in the WHO, UNODC and UNAIDS Target Setting Guide.27

* Meaningfully involve members of the affected community in developing, monitoring and implementing services and policies that affect their lives.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies