Skip to main content

U.S. Politics How Elizabeth Warren sparked the ‘she persisted’ meme

U.S. POLITICS

King's letter and Warren's stand: Four quotes to explain the 'she persisted' meme

A rare rebuke in the Senate has made Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren a lightning rod for critics of the Trump administration. Here's a primer on what she did and the story behind the 1986 letter she was quoting

Sen. Elizabeth Warren speaks on Capitol Hill on Feb. 8, 2017.

1. 'She was warned. She was given an explanation. Nevertheless, she persisted'

-Senator Mitch McConnell

The U.S. Senate floor has been a fierce battleground over the confirmation of President Donald Trump's cabinet picks. Some of the most rancorous debate has been about Jeff Sessions, his pick for attorney-general. Democrats have been strongly opposed to the Alabama Republican over his record on civil rights and immigration, both contentious issues at the centre of the Justice Department's current courtroom fight over Mr. Trump's immigration ban.

U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions. SAUL LOEB/AFP/GETTY IMAGES

On Wednesday, a 52-47 vote – split almost precisely along party lines – approved Mr. Sessions's appointment, capping off weeks of divisive argument. But a day earlier, one of the Democrats arguing against Mr. Sessions was ordered to stay silent.

Story continues below advertisement

Massachussetts Democrat Elizabeth Warren tried to read aloud from a letter from Martin Luther King Jr.'s widow, Coretta Scott King, written in 1986 to oppose Mr. Sessions' appointment to a federal judge's post in Alabama. Ms. King, who died in 2006, accused Mr. Sessions of discriminating against black voters in his role as a federal prosecutor.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, middle, speaks to reporters alongside other Republican senators on Capitol Hill on Feb. 7, 2017.

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell ordered Ms. Warren to sit and be silent. He invoked an obscure Senate rule that forbids one senator from demeaning another, and was barred from speaking further about Mr. Sessions on the Senate floor. That rule, Senate Rule 19, says:

A senator in debate, who, in the opinion of the presiding officer, refers offensively to any state of the union, or who impugns the motives or integrity of any senator, or reflects on other senators, may be called to order under Rule XIX.

Senate rebukes Elizabeth Warren for criticisms of Jeff Sessions

Explaining his rationale for the order, Mr. McConnell said Ms. Warren had been warned, but "nevertheless, she persisted." That phrase became a rallying cry for critics on social media:

The Senate voted 49-43 along party lines to sustain the decision to rebuke Ms. Warren. After the vote, other senators, including Bernie Sanders of Vermont and Tom Udall of New Mexico, read Ms. King's letter without facing any objection, prompting some activists to raise charges of sexism.

Ms. Warren read the statement from Ms. King in full on Facebook.

During the debate on whether to make Jeff Sessions the next Attorney General, I tried to read a letter from Coretta Scott King on the floor of the Senate. The letter, from 30 years ago, urged the Senate to reject the nomination of Jeff Sessions to a federal judgeship. The Republicans took away my right to read this letter on the floor - so I'm right outside, reading it now.

Posted by U.S. Senator Elizabeth Warren on Tuesday, February 7, 2017

2. 'Mr. Sessions has used the awesome powers of his office to chill the free exercise of the vote by black citizens'

-Coretta Scott King

The letter Ms. Warren got in trouble for quoting also had a history of being silenced: It wasn't included in the original record for the Alabama senator's hearing in 1986. Staffers from the hearing say a clerical error must have kept it from being included.

Story continues below advertisement

The 1986 letter from Coretta Scott King, who died in 2006, got renewed attention after Ms. Warren's rebuke. The Washington Post and other news organizations published it in full. Here's a piece from the cover letter:

Anyone who has used the power of his office as United States Attorney to intimidate and chill the free exercise of the ballot by citizens should not be elevated to our courts. Mr. Sessions has used the awesome powers of his office in a shabby attempt to intimidate and frighten elderly black voters.
Coretta Scott King embraces her husband, Martin Luther King Jr., on Sept. 30, 1958, at a New York hospital where he was recovering from a stab wound following an attack by a woman. TONY CAMERANO/ASSOCIATED PRESS

Ms. King wrote that a previous appointment kept her from being in Washington personally to speak against Mr. Sessions. "I request that my statement, as well as this letter be made a part of the hearing record," she asked then Senate judiciary chairman Strom Thurmond, who was an avowed segregationist in his earlier life. She copied in Democrat Joe Biden, who was a U.S. senator from Delaware before becoming vice-president under president Barack Obama.

Jim Manley, a Democratic consultant and former top Senate aide, called it "unusual" that the letter would not be included. "It think it probably highlights what a flashpoint racial politics played in Sen. Sessions' nomination years ago," Mr. Manley said.

But Thaddeus Strom, former Thurmond chief of staff and chief counsel and staff director of the Senate Judiciary Committee, attributed the absence to a "clerical error":

Certainly it wasn't by design. It's a perfunctory matter to include letters and statements in support and opposition to nominees and these are often submitted by senators on the committee during the hearing. Counsel for Republicans and Democrats would have reviewed the record before it was final and in this instance it appears the ball was dropped.

There was likely nothing nefarious about the letter not being included in the record, added Armstrong Williams, a former Thurmond staffer. There was no hostility between Mr. Thurmond and Ms. King during that period, said Mr. Williams, who has a photo of himself, Ms. King and Mr. Thurmond together.

An undated photo provided by Armstrong Williams, shown at right, shows Strom Thurmond with Coretta Scott King.

Ms. King, in her statement, pointed to Mr. Sessions' prosecution of three black Alabama voting rights activists as why he should not be a federal judge:

Story continues below advertisement

Mr. Sessions sought to punish older black civil rights activists, advisors and colleagues of my husband, who had been key figures in the civil rights movement in the 1960s.

Mr. Sessions said he was not a racist, but he said at his hearing in 1986 that groups such as the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People and the American Civil Liberties Union could be considered "un-American." He also acknowledged he had called the Voting Rights Act of 1965 a "piece of intrusive legislation." Mr. Sessions was eventually rejected as a federal judge, but went on to become Alabama's U.S. senator.

One of the three activists the King letter mentions, Evelyn Turner, still has not forgiven Mr. Sessions. She said she saw Mr. Sessions in Washington, D.C. last year before his nomination; He attempted to speak to her but did not apologize for his prosecution. "After all these years, my stomach still aches when I think of the pain he caused so many people," she said in a January letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee.


Protesters demonstrate outside the house of Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell in Washington ahead of the Senate vote to confirm Jeff Sessions as attorney-general on Feb. 8, 2017.

3. 'Such a nasty woman'

-Donald Trump

On Wednesday, Republicans betrayed no regret for their move, accusing Ms. Warren of ignoring repeated warnings to avoid violating Rule 19. Here's what Republican Senator John McCain said:

You don't insult – whether it be from a letter, or from a message from God, or on golden tablets. That's the rules of the Senate. They want to complain about it, complain about it.

In a post-vote valedictory speech, Mr. Sessions alluded to the bitter partisanship and wished for more collegiality:

Denigrating people who disagree with us, I think, is not a healthy trend for our body.

Democrats weren't buying the arguments about civility, and Twitter saw a revival of another political meme Ms. Warren was attached to last year: #nastywoman, a phrase Mr. Trump used to describe his Democratic rival, Hillary Clinton, at a presidential debate last fall. Ms. Warren used that slogan on the campaign trail, predicting that "nasty women" would turn out to elect Ms. Clinton. Here's how she put it at an October rally in New Hampshire:

Nasty women are tough. Nasty women are smart. And nasty women vote. ... We nasty women are going to march our nasty feet to cast our nasty votes to get you out of our lives forever.

Ms. Clinton returned the favour on Wednesday in a tweet supporting Ms. Warren:


4. 'We won't be silent. We will speak out. And we WILL persist'

-Elizabeth Warren

For Ms. Warren's supporters, the controversy over the King letter was the latest and most visceral example of a woman muzzled by men who seemed unwilling to listen. Critics saw something else: a senator who has rankled members of both parties with her nose for the spotlight lobbing a far-too-early salvo in the next presidential race. "A lot of that's about 2020 politics," Republican Senator John Thune said on MSNBC.

Ms. Warren is considered a very early front-runner for 2020, should she run. Mr. McConnell's explanation for his manoeuvre seemed destined for a future Warren campaign ad, and after Mr. Sessions' confirmation, she began putting the slogan to use:


MORE FROM THE GLOBE AND MAIL

Report an error
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Latest Videos