Skip to main content

Policewomen ride motorised vehicles on Tiananmen Square in Beijing March 3, 2011.

David Grau/Reuters

Memory in China is not your own. The official version is the only one allowed in public discussion of events like the Tiananmen Square massacre that occurred 23 years ago today.

Each year, the Communist Party's censors go to remarkable lengths to prevent Chinese citizens from accessing, or spreading, their memories of what happened on June 4, 1989, when an unknown number of people were killed during a military crackdown on pro-democracy protests in the centre of Beijing. Since Sunday night, even simple numbers like 6 (the month of June), 4 (the date) and 89 have been banned search terms on Chinese social-networking sites.

And so all day today users in China got bizarre replies from their search engines. "According to the relevant laws and policies, the results of your search '89' cannot be displayed," was the head-shaker I just read on my own screen. Typing "Tiananmen Square" – in English or Chinese – gets the same answer on the popular Sina Weibo site, which boasts over 300 million users. Pity the poor tourist just trying to find the plaza in the middle of the Chinese capital.

Story continues below advertisement

Such farces would only multiply throughout Monday's anniversary. As the day went on, even the stock market news – as well as the online memorial for the Chinese student who was murdered in Montreal – were caught in the censors' ever-widening nets.

Eventually even "jintian" – the Chinese word for "today" – was a banned search term on such social networking sites, as the powers and weaknesses of those who rule China were simultaneously displayed.

(The sina.com and baidu.com search engines allows don't bar the terms, but only return politically approved material, such as a China Daily article headlined "Tiananmen Square massacre a myth.") Chinese Internet users are a wily bunch. Last year, they briefly evaded censors by referring to the date of the crackdown as "May 35th" rather than June 4th, a move that forced the conversation-killers to ban a non-existent date this year.

The censors subsequently decided that even some non-words pose a threat, disabling a function on Sina Weibo that allowed users to post a tiny drawing (or "emoticon") of a candle. Activist Hu Jia was arrested in 2004 after telling reporters he planned to go to Tiananmen Square and light a candle on the 15th anniversary of the crackdown. As of Sunday night, even lighting a virtual candle was impossible.

The absurdity of such measures was made plain in another, completely unrelated corner of the Internet.

All weekend long, tributes piled up on the Weibo page of Lin Jun, the 33-year-old from Hubei province who was brutally murdered and dismembered in Montreal late last month. By Sunday night, there were more than 20,000 comments on Mr. Lin's page. Many users, at a loss for words, had simply posted the candle emoticon in simple tribute.

But today, the censors' new rules had marred even something so moving and apolitical as the public outpouring for Mr. Lin (while letting the anti-gay slurs posted by a hateful minority remain on his site). Where once there had been rows of flickering orange candles on Mr. Lin's Weibo page, there now read the somewhat less moving "[candle][candle][candle][candle][candle]."

Story continues below advertisement

As usual, there were those who found ways to get around the censors and let their feelings be known. "Candle. Nothing is forgotten," one Shanghai-based Internet user wrote in English, in defiant reference to the Tiananmen anniversary. A prominent Chinese blogger, @zuola, also posted some previously unseen photographs of soldiers on Tiananmen Square in the immediate aftermath of the Tiananmen Square crackdown.

And some things will always remain beyond the control of even China's hard-working censors.

The weakening outlook for the global economy hit Asian markets hard Monday. The benchmark Shanghai Composite Index was among those that saw losses, falling precisely 64.89 in trading – a random reminder of the very anniversary Beijing was working so hard to help people forget.

"The Shanghai Composite Index is crying, everybody understands it," a netizen from Shanghai wrote shortly after the markets were closed.

Those who saw the data might have recognized the familiar numbers. But they would have had to be quick. Shortly after trading ended, the words "Shanghai Composite Index" temporarily joined China's long list of banned terms.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter