Skip to main content

Suzanne Legault is the Information Commissioner of Canada.

Governments create and hold a large amount of information. In a society that runs on information, access to this information is necessary for us to understand how government operates. This also allows us to better understand our democracy and contribute to its economic and social advancement.

This is the premise behind the Open Government movement in which Canada is a vocal proponent. When information is available to citizens, there are more opportunities for new ideas, innovation, better and more responsive decision-making, and even program savings.

Story continues below advertisement

It follows, then, that the ability to access relevant and useful government information rests on a modern access to information legislation.

It is in that context that I presented 85 recommendations to Parliament for the modernization of the Access to Information Act.

A modern access law promotes accountability. At present, not all entities that spend taxpayers' money or perform public functions are subject to the Act. Under my recommendations, Canadians would see much broader coverage of the Act, including the Prime Minister's Office, ministers' offices, the institutions that support Parliament and the administration of the courts.

A modern access law is adapted to the current realities and expectations of Canadians. The Act was conceived more than 30 years ago. But is there anything that is changing more rapidly than information – how it is generated, collected, stored, managed and shared? The increasing use of mobile devices by the government, for example, poses new risks to access to information rights. Yet, the Act has not been amended to increase its capacity to appropriately protect these rights. This is why I am recommending a legal duty to document the decision-making process to ensure that official records are created, and a legal duty to report the unauthorised destruction or loss of information.

A modern access to information law strikes the right balance between the public's right to know and the government's need to protect legitimate interests. This exercise is at the core of access to information. When the Act was introduced in Parliament, it was referred to as a law that would open government. After more than 30 years of existence, the record shows that the Act has been, and continues to be, interpreted and applied as a shield against transparency. My recommendations favour a move towards maximizing the disclosure of government information – all government records would be subject to independent review and would be released unless there are very good reasons to limit disclosure. In a revised Act, all exclusions would be eliminated including the one for Cabinet confidences, and there would be clear limits placed on the exemptions that must remain to protect specific types of information. The decision-makers would also have to consider the public interest in the information.

Finally, a modern access law promotes timely and proactive disclosure of information in formats that are readily accessible to the public, strengthens oversight with order-making powers and provides for an effective compliance model.

A modern access law will assist Canadians in exercising their right to know what is happening in government. It will help foster a government culture that is "open by default." Improved access to information will increase government accountability and citizen understanding, stimulate ideas and innovation, and ultimately enhance trust in public officials and institutions.

Story continues below advertisement

A modern Access to Information Act is long overdue.

Report an error
Comments

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • All comments will be reviewed by one or more moderators before being posted to the site. This should only take a few moments.
  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed. Commenters who repeatedly violate community guidelines may be suspended, causing them to temporarily lose their ability to engage with comments.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.
Cannabis pro newsletter