Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](,dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

J.D.M. Stewart is the author of Being Prime Minister and a history teacher at Bishop Strachan School in Toronto.

Prime Minister Lester Pearson once wrote that “Prime ministers require the hide of a rhinoceros, the morals of St. Francis, the patience of Job, the wisdom of Solomon, the strength of Hercules, the leadership of Napoleon, the magnetism of a Beatle and the subtlety of Machiavelli.”

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau will need all of these qualities, too, as he, his cabinet and the entire country take on a crisis as severe as any faced by his predecessors: a pernicious coronavirus. But as those previous PMs knew well, these moments also serve as a test of leadership: How a prime minister handles a crisis can define their legacy.

Story continues below advertisement

A look back at a few of these touchstones shows what works and what doesn’t – and how, perhaps crucially, prime ministers should watch out for their health, because crises take a toll.

Robert Borden and the Conscription Crisis of 1917

Sir Robert Borden collapsed from stress during the conscription crisis of 1917.

DUPRAS & SOLAS/Library and Archives Canada via THE CANADIAN PRESS

“How far [are] democratic nations willing to go in the pursuit of victory?”

Many observers have compared the current pandemic to a country at war. For Conservative prime minister Robert Borden, who led Canada during the First World War, the years between 1914 and 1918 would be so difficult it nearly cost him his life. You could pick any number of single episodes from this period – from the enormous loss of life in the battlefields of Flanders to the burning down of the Parliament buildings in 1916, or the deadly Halifax Explosion the following year. But it was the Conscription Crisis of 1917 that really took its toll on the prime minister.

Borden’s government introduced mandatory military enlistment in May, 1917, and soon after the prime minister faced death threats, necessitating a security detail outside his home and for his travels to and from Parliament. As the country grappled with an issue that divided it along linguistic lines, the 63-year-old Borden collapsed from stress in September. He was ordered by his doctor to rest in bed.

To manage the national crisis, Borden opted to form a coalition Union government with Wilfrid Laurier’s Liberals, only a handful of whom joined what was called the Unionist Party. The ensuing election in December was one of the nastiest in the country’s history and Borden did all he could to ensure a Unionist victory, including allowing women to vote for the first time – but only if they had a relative serving in the military.

As Mr. Trudeau wrestles with how far he may need to curb the civil liberties of Canadians during the pandemic, the question asked about Borden by historian Tim Cook in his book Warlords has obvious resonance today: “One of the fundamental questions raised in assessing Borden’s wartime leadership pertains to how far democratic nations are willing to go in the pursuit of victory.”

Mackenzie King and the stock market crash of 1929

Mackenzie King claimed 'the soundness of Canadian securities generally is not affected' when the markets crashed on Black Tuesday.

Library of Congress

“I wouldn’t give them a five-cent piece.”

Story continues below advertisement

As we are learning from the current crisis, it’s best to act quickly and to avoid the “everything is fine” position exemplified by U.S. President Donald Trump. In his second of three go-rounds as prime minister, Mackenzie King erred on both counts.

When he was asked about the events of Oct. 29, 1929, when stock markets in New York and Toronto tanked so deeply it was named Black Tuesday, the Liberal prime minister replied that, “while no doubt a number of people have suffered owing to the sharp decline in stocks, the soundness of the Canadian securities generally is not affected. Business [had] never [been] better, nor faith in Canada’s future more justified.”

“In his entire career up to this point," noted King biographer Allan Levine, "he had never been so wrong about any other political or economic crisis.”

The prime minister did little to address the spreading economic malaise, and his biographer writes that few in the world understood the gravity of what was happening at the time. Nonetheless, King’s intemperance made matters worse when he said in the House of Commons that he would give no federal funding to any provincial government to address the problem of unemployment if they were led by Tories. “I would not give them a five-cent piece.”

Partisanship and impetuousness are not helpful in a national crisis. King lost the election to R.B. Bennett the following year.

Mackenzie King and the Conscription Crisis of 1944

King, left, casts his ballot in the April 27, 1942 Conscription Plebiscite in Ottawa.

Library and Archives Canada

“Conscription if necessary, but not necessarily conscription.”

Story continues below advertisement

“The most critical 35 days in the political life of William Lyon Mackenzie King, and perhaps in the life of the Canadian nation, began on Oct. 19, 1944, and ended on Nov. 22.”

So begins a 1952 story in Maclean’s magazine by the legendary journalist Bruce Hutchison about the second Conscription Crisis in Canada. King, who returned to power with a majority government in the 1935 election, had been a member of Parliament during the previous episode in 1917 and knew conscription was to be avoided at all costs because of the divisions it caused. He promised not to impose it at the outset of the Second World War in 1939.

A 1942 plebiscite asked Canadians to release the King government from that promise, which it did, while exposing the usual rift between Quebec – the province voted 73 per cent against doing so – and the rest of Canada, which was 80 per cent in favour. The prime minister had bought himself some time, epitomized by his now famous line about having “conscription if necessary, but not necessarily conscription.”

After manpower shortages struck Canada’s army in 1944, the crisis turned white hot. King’s cabinet tore itself apart, with English-Canadian ministers clamouring for soldiers to be sent overseas right away. But the prime minister, still wary of mandatory enlistment for national-unity reasons, engineered the resignation of pro-conscription defence minister James Ralston, replacing him with Andrew McNaughton, who promised he could get the needed volunteers.

When that effort failed, King had no other option but to send over the soldiers mobilized for home defence. But through prevarication, cunning and resolve, the prime minister kept his cabinet and the country together in what the Maclean’s piece called “the most extraordinary if not the most important cabinet decision since Confederation.”

John Diefenbaker and the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962

Prime Minister John Diefenbaker speaks in Chesley, Ont., during the 1962 federal election campaign.

Erik Christensen/The Globe and Mail

“A pathological hatred of taking a hard decision.”

Story continues below advertisement

It is clear that a steady hand, along with comfort and certainty with decision-making, are excellent tools to have in your crisis-management toolbox. Unfortunately, Conservative prime minister John Diefenbaker had none of these.

The Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962 put the world on edge due to a standoff between the United States and Soviet Union over the construction of military bases in Cuba. Canada was intimately involved because of its integrated defence systems, a result of the agreement of the North American Aerospace Defence Command.

When defence minister Douglas Harkness was informed that the U.S. had escalated to DEFCON 3 levels of force readiness, he wanted to do the same for Canada and decided to run it past Mr. Diefenbaker. He declined the request until a cabinet meeting could be called the next day. With virtually all cabinet colleagues onside with Mr. Harkness, the chief still refused to give the go-ahead the next day – “chiefly, I think,” wrote Mr. Harkness, “because of a pathological hatred of taking a hard decision.” Mr. Harkness went behind the prime minister’s back and put the forces on alert anyway.

When the U.S. went even higher to DEFCON 2, Mr. Harkness again approached Mr. Diefenbaker; this time, the prime minister just waved his hand in frustration and said, “All right, go ahead.” Not exactly leadership.

Fellow cabinet minister Gordon Churchill told Mr. Harkness that “the country just could not afford to have the Prime Minister in that position at a time of crisis – he refused to act when action was absolutely necessary.”

Pierre Trudeau and the October Crisis of 1970

Pierre Trudeau speaks to reporters in Ottawa about kidnapped British diplomat James Cross on Dec. 3, 1970.

Chuck Mitchell/The Canadian Press

“Just watch me.”

Story continues below advertisement

In October, 1970, the Front de libération du Québec kidnapped British diplomat James Cross. Five days later, the FLQ grabbed Quebec labour minister Pierre Laporte, and Liberal prime minister Pierre Trudeau was embroiled in one of most difficult crises ever to face a Canadian leader.

Mr. Trudeau ordered the Canadian military to defend public officials in Ottawa and the prime minister’s trip to the House of Commons on Oct. 13 led to the famous interview in which he uttered the words, “Just watch me,” after being asked how far he was willing to go to deal with the crisis.

Faced with grave uncertainties and unrest in Montreal, Mr. Trudeau’s cabinet intensely debated invoking the War Measures Act, which would suspend civil liberties. A day after declaring the act, Mr. Laporte was murdered by the FLQ and left abandoned in the trunk of a car. (Margaret Sinclair, who would later become Mr. Trudeau’s wife, said she “watched him grow old before my eyes” when he got the news.)

The War Measures Act and Mr. Laporte’s murder changed the dynamic of the October Crisis. Mr. Cross was subsequently released as part of a deal that sent the kidnappers to Cuba. But the crisis remains an exemplar of leadership and it was a touchstone of Mr. Trudeau’s legacy. Echoing King in his handling of the Conscription Crisis, Mr. Trudeau showed strength and resolve throughout the October Crisis. As Eric Kierans, a member of Mr. Trudeau’s cabinet, recalled, “Trudeau, as usual, was calm, fully in control. Very, very, impressive.”

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

In the interests of public health and safety, our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access. However, The Globe depends on subscription revenue to support our journalism. If you are able, please subscribe to If you are already a subscriber, thank you for your support.

Your subscription helps The Globe and Mail provide readers with critical news at a critical time. Thank you for your continued support. We also hope you will share important coronavirus news articles with your friends and family. In the interest of public health and safety, all our coronavirus news articles are free for anyone to access.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

UPDATED: Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies