Skip to main content

Some governments die from a drip, drip, drip of scandal. Some die from a gusher of it.

The scandal that is centred on SNC-Lavalin sure looks like a gusher. The engineering company is one of the most important enterprises in Canada. In the past, it has also allegedly greased the palms of foreign fixers to the tune of more than $150-million in bribes. Now the question is whether the company should face a criminal trial that could destroy it, or more benign treatment involving fines and pledges to do better.

None of this is helpful during an election year. And it makes a mockery of Justin Trudeau’s pledges of transparency. What he has discovered is that his government is like any other. It vows to be transparent, until it’s not.

Story continues below advertisement

The scandal cuts to the core of the Trudeau brand in other ways. Nothing could have symbolized his hopes for reconciliation more effectively than his appointment of an Indigenous woman, Jody Wilson-Raybould, as justice minister and attorney-general. She was a walking billboard for his lofty ambitions, and one of his brightest stars. Now the two are locked in a war of credibility – one that he is losing. So far, she hasn’t said a word about what happened. But she doesn’t have to. Every time Mr. Trudeau has spoken on the issue, he’s done himself more damage.

Until more facts emerge – and they will – what we do know already is troubling enough.

Ms. Wilson-Raybould allegedly came under heavy pressure by the Prime Minister’s Office to pursue a remediation agreement rather than allow criminal charges against SNC-Lavalin to proceed. The remediation agreement involves heavy fines, but no criminal penalties.

The central question in the case is whether she was pressed to do anything contrary to law or ethics.

And even if she wasn’t, some people think there’s something awfully fishy about the remediation agreement. The legislation to enact it was buried deep in Mr. Trudeau’s omnibus budget last year – just in time for the SNC-Lavalin case.

The country is divided in two camps over the fate of the company. Many people in English-speaking Canada are not sympathetic. They see crony capitalism at work. But Quebeckers think the company has paid enough for its alleged misdeeds. Most people there, including the thinking class, believe the case should be settled by remediation. “If SNC is condemned the consequences will be fatal,” wrote columnist Michel Girard in Le Journal de Montréal. And the common sentiment in Quebec is why make engineers in Canada pay for the sins of departed executives who allegedly handed out bribes in Libya years ago?

What all this boils down to is that the then-justice minister may have been pressed to make a legal decision of enormous consequence for reasons that are essentially political. That may explain why Mr. Trudeau demoted his star cabinet minister to veterans affairs – a position generally reserved for novices and others low down in the pecking order. She allegedly didn’t do what the PMO wanted with the SNC-Lavalin case, and so Mr. Trudeau essentially fired her and replaced her with somebody more amenable. That person is David Lametti, who has no attractive identity credentials, but seems to have a more benign view about the fate of SNC-Lavalin.

Story continues below advertisement

In retrospect, the demotion of Ms. Wilson-Raybould is one of the worst decisions that Mr. Trudeau ever made. It made her into a martyr and the Prime Minister’s people into bullies. Their damage-control efforts this week have looked silly, partisan, and downright juvenile. For example, the Liberals agreed to hold hearings on the SNC-Lavalin affair – but then prevented key players from being invited, including the justice minister or anyone from the Prime Minister’s Office.

Meanwhile, the Indigenous community is furious. They are using the shoddy treatment of Ms. Wilson-Raybould to pummel the PM hard. "Racist and sexist,” the Union of B.C. Indian Chiefs protested. Ms. Wilson-Raybould’s father, Bill Wilson, who is a Kwakwaka’wakw hereditary chief, called her treatment “a bloody insult to her and Indians across the country.”

As of now, Ms. Raybould controls the stage. Everyone is waiting for her to offer her version of events. Meantime, one of Canada’s biggest and most important companies is twisting in the wind. SNC-Lavalin may end up paying the highest price for this affair, because the optics of pushing for remediation might simply have become too bad for the government to pursue. Mr. Trudeau is also a big loser. His government has been shown to be as politically driven and fallible as any other. I doubt that the public is very shocked. We learned to be cynical a long time ago. ​

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter