Skip to main content

In the end, a battered economy trumped everything.

Jason Kenney and his United Conservative Party won a historic Alberta election Tuesday, overcoming concerns about his own moral and ethical imperatives and a string of controversies generated by UCP candidates linked to racist and homophobic commentary. While the public storms these incidents caused undoubtedly cost Mr. Kenney support, it was not enough to jeopardize the lead his party had established over the NDP.

Now hold on to your hats.

Story continues below advertisement

The province, and the country, will not have seen an Alberta premier this ready to rock conventions, to disrupt the status quo, since Ralph Klein. This is why so many voters found Mr. Kenney an attractive option to NDP Leader Rachel Notley, who, despite her personal popularity, was seen as too cautious a choice for the perilous times that have enveloped the province.

Related: Kenney wins majority as UCP routs NDP in campaign dominated by economic woes

Four years of high unemployment. A recession that left looming shadows on the horizon that could portend another. Stuttering economic growth. Burgeoning debt. No new pipeline. Up against that, and facing a highly skilled politician not afraid of a good scrap, Ms. Notley and the NDP didn’t stand a chance despite running an effective campaign.

Am I better off today than I was when the government seeking re-election took over? That is a question nearly all voters ask themselves when it comes time to mark their ballot. When I asked Ms. Notley before the start of the campaign how she felt she and how her party would fare on that count, she replied honestly: “There is no question we have a bit of a tougher haul on that one than most governments.”

And she was right. Yet still, she will go down as one of the more popular Alberta premiers in recent years, one far more admired than her party but who placed some bets in a bid to get a new pipeline built that just didn’t pay. Had construction started on the Trans Mountain expansion by now, the outcome of this election would likely have been radically different.

Now, it is Mr. Kenney’s turn to see if he can get it built, which means sitting down with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, a politician for whom the Alberta premier-designate has little-disguised contempt. That initial conversation should be entertaining, assuming Mr. Kenney is serious about his threat to roll back most of the environmental reforms introduced by the previous NDP administration as part of its quid pro quo agreement with Mr. Trudeau to get the pipeline built.

That pact would appear to be worthless now.

Alberta election 2019: Kenney victory another thorn in side of Trudeau as he seeks re-election

Alberta election 2019: B.C. braces for stormy relations – but there is a sliver of a silver lining

Alberta election 2019: Jason Kenney has won. What happens now? A guide

As the election smoke clears, it will likely become more apparent that there is little Mr. Kenney has offered that will do anything to fix his province’s ailing economy, in the short term at least. The announcements that drew the most fanfare, and engendered the most support from Albertans, were highly symbolic in nature.

Story continues below advertisement

Promising to hold a referendum on equalization is a prime example. Asking Albertans if they feel the current equalization formula is unfair is ridiculous. Of course, they’re going to say it is. The bigger question is what, if anything, can be done about it. It’s a federally run program. The current funding formula was negotiated by former Conservative prime minister Stephen Harper’s cabinet, of which Mr. Kenney was a member at the time. There is far from a consensus among the provinces that anything should be done and if that position prevails, then what?

Does Alberta secede? Which would be just about their only option if it wanted no part of the current arrangement.

Mr. Kenney has promised to kill the carbon tax. So what? The federal backstop will kick in. He’s promised to pick a fight with British Columbia. Again, so what? B.C. is not the province’s enemy. The federal government now owns the pipeline, rendering many of B.C.’s objections and strategies irrelevant and inconsequential.

Mr. Kenney has also pledged to stand up to the messaging of foreign-funded environmental groups – like that will help Alberta get a pipeline faster. He’s used the empty oil and gas towers of downtown Calgary as a campaign backdrop but does not have a real plan to fill them – the city’s mayor Naheed Nenshi has said as much.

The most flashy undertaking he’s proposed to give the economy a boost is to cut corporate income taxes from 12 per cent to 8 per cent over four years. It will cost the treasury an estimated $1.7-billion in income, with no guarantees it will create the jobs to make up for it.

Even Mr. Kenney’s budget plans don’t differ radically from the NDP’s. There will be some cuts to program spending, but nothing outlandish. The UCP has promised to bring the books back to balance only one year earlier than the NDP. Perhaps most significantly, the UCP has no plans to get off the royalty roller coaster that has caused so many of Alberta’s problems over the years.

Story continues below advertisement

But none of this mattered much in this election. People had a yearning for the glory years, when money flowed easily, and the province was the envy of the country. Mr. Kenney won because he was best able to persuade people he can lead them back there.

Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

Cannabis pro newsletter