Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

At the start of the year, Mitt Romney bared his knuckles and voted to impeach Donald Trump, becoming the first senator in the republic’s history to vote to remove a president of his own party.

This week, however, Mitt put on his mittens. The Utah senator said he would side with the President – the one he had wanted guillotined – in appointing a new Supreme Court justice to replace the late Ruth Bader Ginsburg, instead of allowing the election result to determine which party should have the right.

The easy yielding of perfidious Republicans such as Mr. Romney and Lindsey Graham, who tore up his vow that new justices should not be appointed in an election year, all but assures the ascent of another core conservative to the court. The new nominee will be the third justice Mr. Trump has installed at the top court in the land, giving conservatives an overwhelming two to one (6-3) advantage over the Democrats' nominees in the government’s judicial branch.

Story continues below advertisement

Given the immense power of the court, Democrats might well be asking whether this election is even worth winning. On many of the major issues of the day, such as health care, abortion rights, immigration, LGBTQ rights, voting rights, union power and civil rights, the Republicans will still wield much of the power. As Mr. Trump declared at a rally in Pennsylvania Tuesday, the Supreme Court justices “will set policy for 50 years.”

That outcome can be prevented, however, if Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden responds in kind to the Mephistophelean tactics of his shameless opponents. What the Trump Republicans are essentially doing is court-packing, and many are advocating that Democrats should respond with a court-packing plan of their own by vowing if elected to increase the size of the court by adding four liberally inclined justices.

The constitution does not forbid such court-packing or, more precisely, court-stacking. The court’s size has been changed through legislation over time. To be sure, however, it would be a cynical power grab – but it wouldn’t be so egregious if the Democrats campaigned on the policy and, if they won the election, earned a mandate to enact it.

For Mr. Biden, however, such a move would be an act of abject hypocrisy on his part, because he’d previously stated that the court should not be turned into a political football. Just last year, he said “we’ll live to rue that day” if the court was expanded, saying it would Iead to round after round of expansion, with Republicans doing the same as Democrats. The court would “lose all credibility.” In utter contrast to Mr. Trump, Mr. Biden has nurtured a reputation for respecting institutions.

Democrats calling for him to shed his holier-than-thou nimbus point to what happened in 2016, when Republican Senate leader Mitch McConnell blocked Barack Obama from appointing Merrick Garland to the court, asserting that in an election year, the people should be left to decide. Now, Mr. McConnell has reversed himself, saying it’s okay to do so this year because, as opposed to 2016, the governing party now controls the Senate.

Mr. Graham, the Senate’s judiciary committee chairman, has done the same, only in more blatant fashion. In 2016, the oleaginous senator went so far as to tell voters that he wanted them to “use my words against me,” should he not hold to his vow that justices shouldn’t be appointed in an election year. Brazenly, Mr. Graham is now refuting them. He even had the gall to send out a fundraising appeal on Tuesday, bellyaching about protesters who “screamed, blared horns and pounded on the front door of my house in Washington.” As if he didn’t have it coming.

Republicans still retain control of the Senate, and they have an even-money chance of maintaining that control on Nov. 3. That would mean that in both legislative and judicial branches, they would potentially retain a great deal of strength, thus emphatically diminishing the scope of a Biden victory should one happen.

Story continues below advertisement

The Democrats, though, could play hardball on the Senate as well. They could commit in the campaign to granting statehood to the heavily liberal District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, ensuring them four more senate seats in future elections.

Mr. Biden doesn’t wish to reduce himself to the level of a Mitch McConnell. But as Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said on Tuesday, “We can’t have business as usual when Republicans are destroying the institutions, as they have done.”

Turning the other cheek sounds nice in the scriptures. But when confronted by the sordid scheming of the Trump Republicans, it would be a ruinous course for Mr. Biden to follow.

Keep your Opinions sharp and informed. Get the Opinion newsletter. Sign up today.

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow the author of this article:

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

Comments that violate our community guidelines will be removed.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies