Skip to main content
The Globe and Mail
Support Quality Journalism.
The Globe and Mail
First Access to Latest
Investment News
Collection of curated
e-books and guides
Inform your decisions via
Globe Investor Tools
Just$1.99
per week
for first 24 weeks

Enjoy unlimited digital access
Enjoy Unlimited Digital Access
Get full access to globeandmail.com
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
Just $1.99 per week for the first 24 weeks
var select={root:".js-sub-pencil",control:".js-sub-pencil-control",open:"o-sub-pencil--open",closed:"o-sub-pencil--closed"},dom={},allowExpand=!0;function pencilInit(o){var e=arguments.length>1&&void 0!==arguments[1]&&arguments[1];select.root=o,dom.root=document.querySelector(select.root),dom.root&&(dom.control=document.querySelector(select.control),dom.control.addEventListener("click",onToggleClicked),setPanelState(e),window.addEventListener("scroll",onWindowScroll),dom.root.removeAttribute("hidden"))}function isPanelOpen(){return dom.root.classList.contains(select.open)}function setPanelState(o){dom.root.classList[o?"add":"remove"](select.open),dom.root.classList[o?"remove":"add"](select.closed),dom.control.setAttribute("aria-expanded",o)}function onToggleClicked(){var l=!isPanelOpen();setPanelState(l)}function onWindowScroll(){window.requestAnimationFrame(function() {var l=isPanelOpen(),n=0===(document.body.scrollTop||document.documentElement.scrollTop);n||l||!allowExpand?n&&l&&(allowExpand=!0,setPanelState(!1)):(allowExpand=!1,setPanelState(!0))});}pencilInit(".js-sub-pencil",!1); // via darwin-bg var slideIndex = 0; carousel(); function carousel() { var i; var x = document.getElementsByClassName("subs_valueprop"); for (i = 0; i < x.length; i++) { x[i].style.display = "none"; } slideIndex++; if (slideIndex> x.length) { slideIndex = 1; } x[slideIndex - 1].style.display = "block"; setTimeout(carousel, 2500); } //

Frank Ching is a Hong Kong-based journalist.

Frank Ching.

China has recently been insisting more loudly that Taiwan is a part of China and heightening Taiwan’s diplomatic isolation by luring away allies such as Panama, the Dominican Republic and El Salvador. Further, it has been pushing for universal acknowledgment of what it says is a fact, and pressuring companies – including United Airlines, hotel chain Marriott and fashion retailer Zara - to declare on their websites that Taiwan is a part of China.

As Wang Yi, Chinese Foreign Minister and State Councilor, told Carlos Castaneda, the El Salvadoran foreign minister, “the one-China principle is a universally recognized norm for international relations, a general consensus of the international community....”

Story continues below advertisement

The sense of inevitability was echoed by the Salvadoran president, Salvador Sanchez Ceren, who said in his televised announcement on breaking relations with Taiwan to establish ties with Beijing: “El Salvador can’t turn its back on international reality.”

El Salvador’s defection seems to have finally galvanized the United States into action.

The White House issued a statement saying the decision to end relations with Taiwan was made “in a non-transparent fashion” and that it would affect “the economic health and security of the entire Americas region.” It warned that El Salvador’s “receptiveness to China’s apparent interference in the domestic politics of a Western Hemisphere country is of grave concern to the United States,” and would result in a re-evaluation of its relationship with El Salvador.

Not surprisingly, the Chinese government pointed out that the United States itself had established diplomatic ties with China in 1979 and severed relations with Taiwan, but now “it is threatening another sovereign country not to recognize the one-China principle and develop normal relations with China.”

Since the United States recognized Beijing nearly 40 years ago, 67 other countries have followed in its footsteps, recognizing China and breaking relations with Taiwan. El Salvador was only the most recent.

But now, it seems, the United States no longer favors other countries doing what it did four decades ago. Instead, it is putting pressure on the 17 countries that still have diplomatic relations with Taiwan to keep those ties and not to establish formal relations with China.

A Chinese foreign ministry spokesman also denied “interference” in El Salvador’s domestic politics and instead advised the United States “to show respect for other countries’ independent right to determine their domestic and foreign affairs.”

Story continues below advertisement

The Trump administration is treading on very sensitive ground. In 1979, the United States had, in a joint communiqué, recognized the People’s Republic of China as the “sole legal government of China.” In addition, it declared that it “acknowledges the Chinese position that there is but one China and Taiwan is part of China.”

Now, the United States is in effect challenging the Chinese position that Taiwan is part of China.

There is no excuse for China’s bullying tactics in blackmailing governments and companies to endorse its position on Taiwan. China will no doubt argue that what it is doing is laying the groundwork for eventual peaceful unification with Taiwan.

However, it has not been averse to using force. China has conducted naval exercises in the Taiwan Strait and Chinese bombers have flown around the island in a threatening show of force. Chinese missiles have also splashed down in waters adjacent to Taiwanese ports.

Moreover, the threat to use force is there for all to see in the Anti-Secession Law, passed by China in 2005 to give itself the right to use force if “possibilities for a peaceful reunification should be completely exhausted.” In those circumstances, “the state shall employ non-peaceful means and other necessary measures to protect China’s sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

In the Taiwan Relations Act, which was passed by the U.S. Congress in 1979, the United States asserts that the establishment of diplomatic relations with “the People’s Republic of China rests upon the expectation that the future of Taiwan will be determined by peaceful means.”

Story continues below advertisement

The act includes procedures by which the White House must notify Congress in case of a threat to Taiwan. Throughout the last four decades, such procedures have never been invoked. In 1996, when China conducted military exercises in the Taiwan Strait, the Clinton administration sent two aircraft carrier battle groups to the vicinity of Taiwan. Outgunned, the Chinese backed down.

The situation is different now, even on the military front. But if China continues to pressure Taiwan on every front, the Trump administration may well be justified in notifying congress of a threat to Taiwan, for a threat there certainly is.

The question then becomes: what can and will the U.S. Congress do?

Your Globe

Build your personal news feed

  1. Follow topics and authors relevant to your reading interests.
  2. Check your Following feed daily, and never miss an article. Access your Following feed from your account menu at the top right corner of every page.

Follow topics related to this article:

View more suggestions in Following Read more about following topics and authors
Report an error Editorial code of conduct
Due to technical reasons, we have temporarily removed commenting from our articles. We hope to have this fixed soon. Thank you for your patience. If you are looking to give feedback on our new site, please send it along to feedback@globeandmail.com. If you want to write a letter to the editor, please forward to letters@globeandmail.com.

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff. Non-subscribers can read and sort comments but will not be able to engage with them in any way. Click here to subscribe.

If you would like to write a letter to the editor, please forward it to letters@globeandmail.com. Readers can also interact with The Globe on Facebook and Twitter .

Welcome to The Globe and Mail’s comment community. This is a space where subscribers can engage with each other and Globe staff.

We aim to create a safe and valuable space for discussion and debate. That means:

  • Treat others as you wish to be treated
  • Criticize ideas, not people
  • Stay on topic
  • Avoid the use of toxic and offensive language
  • Flag bad behaviour

If you do not see your comment posted immediately, it is being reviewed by the moderation team and may appear shortly, generally within an hour.

We aim to have all comments reviewed in a timely manner.

Comments that violate our community guidelines will not be posted.

Read our community guidelines here

Discussion loading ...

To view this site properly, enable cookies in your browser. Read our privacy policy to learn more.
How to enable cookies